Tangential Acceleration and Gravity in a moving car

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a car traveling over a circular-shaped arch at a constant speed, focusing on the forces acting on a person inside the car. The problem specifically addresses the upward force exerted by the car on the person as they pass over the bridge, considering centripetal acceleration and gravitational force.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between gravitational force and centripetal acceleration, questioning how these forces interact and their directions. There is an attempt to clarify the reasoning behind the calculations and the implications of Newton's second law.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the nature of forces and accelerations involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of forces and their directions, but there remains a lack of consensus on the correct approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating potential misunderstandings regarding the roles of gravitational force and centripetal acceleration, as well as the implications of their directions in the context of the problem. The original poster expresses confusion over the answer key's reasoning, indicating a need for further clarification.

Conservation
Messages
63
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A car is driven at a constant speed of 10.0 m/s as it travels over a circular-shaped arch. If the radius of curvature of the bridge is 50.0m, what upward force does the car exert on the 64.0 kg person riding in the car as it passes over the bridge?

Homework Equations


v2/r=ac
Fman on car=Fcar on man
Fg=mag

The Attempt at a Solution


The centripetal acceleration is towards the center, or down towards the bottom of the arched bridge. Similarly, the man's weight is exerted downwards. Both of these forces contribute to the Fman on car.

Hence, Fman on car=mag+mv2/r, making the answer 755.84 N. However, the answer key says that the mag and the mv2/r are in different directions, making the answer 499.84 N instead. Any help on this would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
They are in fact in different directions, so I don't know what the solution means. But for the answer make a free-body diagram.

[itex]∑F_{y} = F - mg = -ma[/itex]

So [itex]F[/itex] in fact equals [itex]mg - ma[/itex]

The error in your reasoning is that the quantity mv^2/r, the centripetal acceleration, is not provided by a separate force -- the weight force provides it, so the relationship changes. Also, it's not tangential acceleration, but instead centripetal acceleration, because it points inward.
 
Wow, my apologies. I meant to say centripetal-I have no idea why I said tangential.

I don't understand what you mean by the fact that the weight force "provides the centripetal acceleration." Could you elaborate on the topic?

Also, why are they different directions? Aren't both gravitational weight and centripetal acceleration towards the center, or below the bridge?

Thank you.
 
No problem -- I do it all the time.

Think about it in terms of Newton's second: [itex]F = ma[/itex]

Essentially this means that forces provide accelerations, and accelerations need forces to produce them. So the centripetal acceleration needs a force to produce it, and this is the weight force. Centripetal forces are what provide centripetal accelerations, so in this case weight force also acts as the centripetal force. Mathematically, the quantities go on separate sides of the equation, which is how you get that negative sign in the answer. That's why even though they're in the same direction, their magnitudes don't add -- they're different quantities.

EDIT: Sorry, I meant in my first post to say that weight force and acceleration are in the same direction -- just mathematically they end up opposite one another.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K