Tangran, Inertial Mass and Gravitational Mass

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between inertial mass and gravitational mass, asserting that they are effectively identical and that gravitational mass is merely an approximation. The analogy of a tangram puzzle illustrates the complexity of mass, emphasizing that both forms of mass derive from energy, momentum, and stress in matter and radiation. Participants, including @vanhees71, agree that mass is fundamentally inertial and that general relativity resolves the apparent discrepancies between the two types of mass. The conversation also touches on philosophical implications regarding conservation laws and the existence of hypothetical entities like werewolves.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity principles
  • Familiarity with inertial and gravitational mass concepts
  • Knowledge of energy-momentum-stress tensor in physics
  • Basic grasp of the tangram puzzle analogy in problem-solving
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of Einstein's theory of relativity on mass and energy equivalence
  • Research the energy-momentum-stress tensor in general relativity
  • Investigate the philosophical debates surrounding conservation laws in physics
  • Examine the historical context of gravitational mass as an approximation
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of relativity, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of mass and energy in modern physics.

dom_quixote
Messages
52
Reaction score
9
Imagine a tangran puzzle, in which an extra piece "y", identical to piece 'x', is maliciously added.

tangran.JPG

No matter how hard the player tries, he will never be able to restore the game's original form, that is: a perfect square.

This illustration has a clear purpose:

If gravitational mass and inertial mass are in fact identical, isn't one of them unnecessary?
Will the mass puzzle be finally solved by discarding one of the masses?
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: PeroK and weirdoguy
Physics news on Phys.org
But it's solved with general relativity. Both inertia's and gravity's sources are all kinds of energy, momentum, and stress of matter and radiation. Mass is only one contribution to energy and momentum.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark, dom_quixote and Dale
Your puzzle has two pairs of identical triangles, if we maliciously removed one then it couldn’t be solved.

Is mass a triangle or a square?

Of course, @vanhees71 is correct that this has already been solved. Mass is only inertial mass. Gravitational mass is no longer anything other than an approximation and hasn’t been for more than a century now. I just wanted to point out that the analogy is not very good.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and dom_quixote
Dale said:
I just wanted to point out that the analogy is not very good.

Local Hidden Quantic Variables also not?

You can prove that men and wolves exist. But you can't prove werewolves don't exist :smile: !
 
Last edited:
  • Sad
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: PeroK, weirdoguy, Dale and 1 other person
dom_quixote said:
Local Hidden Quantic Variables also not?

You can prove that men and wolves exist. But you can't prove werewolves don't exist :smile: !
All the werewolves in the movies I've seen (I've never seen one in real life) are significantly larger than in their wolf form than their human form. Therefore they violate conservation of energy and can't exist.

-Dan
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: dom_quixote and Dale
Dale said:
Mass is only inertial mass.
I’d say mass in relativity is only rest energy. The fact that this happens to equal the inertia in an object’s rest frame is a fundamental insight of SR and the conclusion regarding how this translates to gravitational mass in the Newtonian limit a fundamental insight of GR.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and Dale
Mass in relativity is only invariant mass. Both the measure of inertia and gravitational interaction strength is energy (or the local version of it, i.e., the energy-momentum-stress tensor of matter and radiation in GR).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dom_quixote, topsquark and Dale
topsquark said:
All the werewolves in the movies I've seen (I've never seen one in real life) are significantly larger than in their wolf form than their human form. Therefore they violate conservation of energy and can't exist.

-Dan
If philosophizing is allowed on this forum, I must say this is the breaking point between creationism and conservationism.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
Thread closed temporarily for Moderation...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Vanadium 50

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K