Taylor polynomial approximation (HELP ME)

Click For Summary
To approximate ln(1.2) using a Taylor polynomial around c = 1 with an error less than 0.001, the discussion highlights the formula for the remainder term, |Rn(1.2)| = (0.02)^(n+1)/(z^(n+1)(n+1)). A key point of confusion arises regarding the transition to the expression 1000 < (n+1)(5^(n+1)), with questions about the omission of the z term in this context. Participants express skepticism about the accuracy of the book's derivation, noting potential errors in the remainder formula. Overall, clarification on the steps and the reasoning behind the omission of z is sought to better understand the approximation process.
frasifrasi
Messages
276
Reaction score
0
Ok, we are asked to determined the degree of the the taylor polynomial about c =1 that should be used to approximate ln (1.2) so the error is less than .001


the book goes through the steps and arrives at:

|Rn(1.2)| = (.02)^(n+1)/(z^(n+1)*(n+1)


but then, it states that

(.02)^(n+1)/(n+1) < .001

and there is an error pointing this expression to

1000 < (n+1)(5^(n+1))

--> I have no idea how the book arrived at this second expression, could anyone please explain?

- Also, if anyone knows, why was the z term left out in the second step?


Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
why was the z term dropped?

does anyone know?
 
I just don't believe your book has what you wrote. For one thing, |Rn(1.2)| = (.02)^(n+1)/(z^(n+1)*(n+1) is missing a ")". For another, the remainder formula has z in the numerator not the denominator- You can't make the error smaller by choosing z larger!
 
OK, in general how does this process work? I am having a little trouble following the steps...

*Yeah, I forgot the last parenthesis
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
4K