Approximating accuracy of Taylor polynomials

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the values of x for which the Taylor polynomial approximation of the function e^x maintains an error less than 0.001. The specific Taylor polynomial being considered is centered at c = 0 and includes terms up to the third degree.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Taylor's Theorem to estimate the error of the polynomial approximation. There is an exploration of how to handle the error term and the implications of the function's behavior as x varies, particularly for x < 0. Some participants question the substitution of z with x in the error term calculation.

Discussion Status

Several participants have offered insights into the problem, including suggestions for alternative approaches and methods to estimate the error. There is acknowledgment of the alternating series nature of the polynomial, and some participants express appreciation for the cleverness of recognizing this aspect. However, there is no explicit consensus on a single method or solution path.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem is constrained to x < 0, which influences the behavior of the exponential function and the error estimation. There is also mention of the Lambert function as a potential tool for solving the equation exactly.

Mangoes
Messages
92
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Determine the values of x for which the function can be replaced by the Taylor polynomial if the error cannot exceed 0.001.

e^x ≈ 1 + x + \frac{x^2}{2!} + \frac{x^3}{3!}

For x < 0

Homework Equations



Taylor's Theorem to approximate a remainder:

|R(x)| = |\frac{f^{n+1}(z)}{(n+1)!}(x-c)^{n+1}|

Where z is some number between c and x, n is the degree of the approximating function, and c is where the function is centered at.

The Attempt at a Solution



From the Taylor polynomial given, c = 0 and n = 3. Since f(x) is e^x, the fourth derivative is simply e^x. If I want an error of less than 0.001,

|R(x)| = |\frac{e^z}{4!}x^4| &lt; 0.001

Not too sure about this next part, but I think that since the function above increases as x increases, which means the error increases with an increasing x, I replaced z by x since the maximum error is given by the largest z value, and the largest z value is equal to x, and I'm interested in the error bound anyways.

|R(x)| = |\frac{(x^4)(e^x)}{4!}| &lt; 0.001

...but I'm still left with the problem that I have to find a value that's stuck in an exponent and outside of one, so I'm assuming I'm doing this wrong and I can't figure out any other way to do it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
When I saw it I wasn't sure if it was a typo or relevant to your question, but as you have stated the problem it is for ##x<0##, which would help with the ##e^x##.
 
You are on the right track. That is a good estimate (about 7% low). To solve your equation exactly you need the Lambert function. You could also solve it approximately in several ways. One of which is to write it
x^4e^x=24/1000
x=fourthroot(24/1000)e^-(x/4)
and iterate a few times
 
If are really only worried about x<0 then you have an alternating series. There's an even easier estimate you could use that doesn't even involve e^x. It turns out to be the same error bound that LCKurtz is suggesting you could arrive at by putting in an upper bound for the exponential.
 
Last edited:
Wow, that's very clever.

I hadn't noticed that the polynomial is the beginning of an alternating series and you can just find the remainder of the alternating series to solve for x.

I hadn't registered the fact that x < 0 in my mind so I didn't see that you could just put 1 in place of the e^x (and you'd get the same expression as if you had used the alternating series remainder to solve for x)

That's pretty cool, thanks for the help guys.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K