Temperature range at which a reaction is spontaneous, Where is the mistake?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on determining the temperature range for spontaneity in a chemical reaction with ΔH = -114.1 kJ and ΔS = -146.4 J/K. The user initially calculates that the reaction is spontaneous for temperatures greater than 780K, but later finds that at 900K, ΔG becomes positive, indicating non-spontaneity. The mistake lies in the handling of the inequality when dividing by the negative ΔS, which should not have resulted in a temperature greater than 780K for spontaneity. Correctly applying the inequality shows that the reaction is spontaneous at temperatures below 780K.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gibbs Free Energy (ΔG) and its relation to spontaneity
  • Knowledge of thermodynamic concepts such as enthalpy (ΔH) and entropy (ΔS)
  • Familiarity with manipulating inequalities in mathematical equations
  • Basic proficiency in unit conversions, specifically between kJ and J
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of Gibbs Free Energy and its implications for chemical reactions
  • Study the effects of temperature on spontaneity in thermodynamics
  • Learn about the correct application of inequalities in mathematical problem-solving
  • Explore examples of enthalpy and entropy calculations in various chemical reactions
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and professionals involved in thermodynamics, particularly those focusing on reaction spontaneity and thermodynamic calculations.

drtg45
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
For a chemical reaction we have, ΔH=-114.1kJ and ΔS=-146.4J/K ---> ΔS=-146.4·10^{-3}kJ/K.

Question: Determine the temperature range at which the reaction is spontaneous.

A reaction is spontaneous when ΔG is negative in the equation ΔG=ΔH-TΔS, so I do:

ΔG=ΔH-TΔS

0>ΔH-TΔS

-ΔH>-TΔS

\frac{-ΔH}{-ΔS}<T (the inequality sign changes direction when we multiply or divide both sides by a negative number right?)

\frac{ΔH}{ΔS}<T (signs cancel each other)

\frac{-114.1kJ}{-146.4·10^-3kJ/K}<T (we input the values)

780K<T , so this tells us that the T must be greater than 780K in order for the reaction to be spontaneous, but then when I check my answer in the original equation:

ΔG=ΔH-TΔS

ΔG=-114.1kJ-(900K)(-146.4·10^{-3}kJ/K) ---> ΔG=18kJ , My inequality answer I suppose is wrong because if T is greater than 780K (in this example I used 900K) then ΔG is positive and the reaction is non spontaneous.

ΔG=-114.1kJ-(200K)(-146.4·10^{-3}kJ/K) ---> ΔG=-85kJ , In here if we use a T lower than 780K the reaction is spontaneous.

I know I made a mistake somewhere because these results are not in accordance with each other, I'm guessing I made the mistake in the inequality while solving for T but I'm honestly not seeing it!, Where did I mess up?:confused:
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I prefer to stay away from negative signs when possible.

TΔS>ΔH

ΔS is a negative value, correct? So to quote you, "(the inequality sign changes direction when we multiply or divide both sides by a negative number right?)"

what does that do to your inequality when you divide the negative ΔS back over?
 
Hey thanks for your reply, I just finished posting something about inequalities in the General Math section, it would be great if you could check it out:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=627753

maybe by doing what I describe in there the problems brought about by the minus sign and the change of direction of the inequality sign can be avoided?
 
-ΔH>-TΔS

plug values

(-1)(-114.1kJ)> (-1)T(-146.4·10^−3kJ/K)

multiply. do you have any negative values in your inequality?
 
ChiralWaltz said:
-ΔH>-TΔS

plug values

(-1)(-114.1kJ)> (-1)T(-146.4·10^−3kJ/K)

multiply. do you have any negative values in your inequality?

That's what I'm talking about, plugging the values before we get to make the mistake and change the direction in the inequality sign.
 
(-1)(-114.1kJ)> (-1)T(-146.4·10^−3kJ/K)

Since you have 2 negative numbers being multiplied on either side, they become positive. Now you don't have have negative numbers anymore, so you don't need to flip the inequality sign when you divide.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
3K