Temperature range at which a reaction is spontaneous, Where is the mistake?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the temperature range at which a chemical reaction is spontaneous, specifically analyzing the relationship between enthalpy (ΔH), entropy (ΔS), and Gibbs free energy (ΔG). Participants explore the implications of signs in inequalities and the correct application of the Gibbs free energy equation.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the temperature threshold for spontaneity using the equation ΔG=ΔH-TΔS and finds that T must be greater than 780K for spontaneity, but later finds inconsistencies with the results.
  • Another participant questions the handling of negative signs in the inequality, suggesting that the direction of the inequality may have been incorrectly applied when dividing by a negative ΔS.
  • Further replies emphasize the importance of avoiding negative signs in calculations to prevent mistakes related to inequality direction.
  • Some participants propose checking the calculations by substituting values before manipulating the inequality to avoid errors.
  • There is a suggestion to clarify the implications of multiplying or dividing by negative numbers in the context of the inequalities involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the correct handling of inequalities and negative signs, indicating that there is no consensus on the correct approach to resolving the issue presented.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential pitfalls in mathematical reasoning related to sign changes and inequalities, but does not resolve the underlying question of the correct temperature range for spontaneity.

drtg45
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
For a chemical reaction we have, ΔH=-114.1kJ and ΔS=-146.4J/K ---> ΔS=-146.4·10^{-3}kJ/K.

Question: Determine the temperature range at which the reaction is spontaneous.

A reaction is spontaneous when ΔG is negative in the equation ΔG=ΔH-TΔS, so I do:

ΔG=ΔH-TΔS

0>ΔH-TΔS

-ΔH>-TΔS

\frac{-ΔH}{-ΔS}<T (the inequality sign changes direction when we multiply or divide both sides by a negative number right?)

\frac{ΔH}{ΔS}<T (signs cancel each other)

\frac{-114.1kJ}{-146.4·10^-3kJ/K}<T (we input the values)

780K<T , so this tells us that the T must be greater than 780K in order for the reaction to be spontaneous, but then when I check my answer in the original equation:

ΔG=ΔH-TΔS

ΔG=-114.1kJ-(900K)(-146.4·10^{-3}kJ/K) ---> ΔG=18kJ , My inequality answer I suppose is wrong because if T is greater than 780K (in this example I used 900K) then ΔG is positive and the reaction is non spontaneous.

ΔG=-114.1kJ-(200K)(-146.4·10^{-3}kJ/K) ---> ΔG=-85kJ , In here if we use a T lower than 780K the reaction is spontaneous.

I know I made a mistake somewhere because these results are not in accordance with each other, I'm guessing I made the mistake in the inequality while solving for T but I'm honestly not seeing it!, Where did I mess up?:confused:
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I prefer to stay away from negative signs when possible.

TΔS>ΔH

ΔS is a negative value, correct? So to quote you, "(the inequality sign changes direction when we multiply or divide both sides by a negative number right?)"

what does that do to your inequality when you divide the negative ΔS back over?
 
Hey thanks for your reply, I just finished posting something about inequalities in the General Math section, it would be great if you could check it out:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=627753

maybe by doing what I describe in there the problems brought about by the minus sign and the change of direction of the inequality sign can be avoided?
 
-ΔH>-TΔS

plug values

(-1)(-114.1kJ)> (-1)T(-146.4·10^−3kJ/K)

multiply. do you have any negative values in your inequality?
 
ChiralWaltz said:
-ΔH>-TΔS

plug values

(-1)(-114.1kJ)> (-1)T(-146.4·10^−3kJ/K)

multiply. do you have any negative values in your inequality?

That's what I'm talking about, plugging the values before we get to make the mistake and change the direction in the inequality sign.
 
(-1)(-114.1kJ)> (-1)T(-146.4·10^−3kJ/K)

Since you have 2 negative numbers being multiplied on either side, they become positive. Now you don't have have negative numbers anymore, so you don't need to flip the inequality sign when you divide.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
3K