Tension with a with a massless rope

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
kbka
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hi...

I have a little assignment where I'm not quite sure, what would be the correct answer...

A massless pulley, is mounted to the ceiling with a massless rope. Over the pulley runs another massles rope, with a box with mass m in one end and a box with mass 2*m in the other.

Q1) In this first question, the friction holds the whole system in equilibrium.
What is the tension T0 between pulley and ceiling, T1 between pulley and box with mass m, T2 between pulley and box with mass 2*m

A1: T1=m*g, T2=2*m*g and T0=(m*2m)*g=3*m*g

Q2) Now, friction is negligible, and the system starts to move... What is the tension T0, T1 and T2
A2: I have calculated T1=T2=4/3*mg and T0=3*m*g (still)

Is the last answer for T0 correct? My assumption is that this part of the system (pulley+rope) is still in equilibrium, and therefore Fres=m*g-T=0
 
Physics news on Phys.org


kbka said:
Hi...

I have a little assignment where I'm not quite sure, what would be the correct answer...

A massless pulley, is mounted to the ceiling with a massless rope. Over the pulley runs another massles rope, with a box with mass m in one end and a box with mass 2*m in the other.

Q1) In this first question, the friction holds the whole system in equilibrium.
What is the tension T0 between pulley and ceiling, T1 between pulley and box with mass m, T2 between pulley and box with mass 2*m

A1: T1=m*g, T2=2*m*g and T0=(m*2m)*g=3*m*g

Q2) Now, friction is negligible, and the system starts to move... What is the tension T0, T1 and T2
A2: I have calculated T1=T2=4/3*mg and T0=3*m*g (still)

Is the last answer for T0 correct? My assumption is that this part of the system (pulley+rope) is still in equilibrium, and therefore Fres=m*g-T=0

If T1 + T2 = T0, then isn't T0 = 8/3mg ?
 
LowlyPion said:
If T1 + T2 = T0, then isn't T0 = 8/3mg ?

Thank you for the reply, but i highly doubt that's the case... I have drawn the situation to make it more clear...

http://peecee.dk/upload/view/136892
 
kbka said:
Thank you for the reply, but i highly doubt that's the case... I have drawn the situation to make it more clear...

http://peecee.dk/upload/view/136892

Is it your suggestion then that T1 + T2 ≠ T0 ?

Looks to me like T1 = m*(g + 1/3g) = T2 = 2m*(g - 1/3g)

2*T1 = 2*T2 = 8/3*m*g = T0