Monkey accelerating up and down a rope

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a monkey climbing a rope connected to a mass on a table. The participants explore the effects of the monkey's acceleration on the overall system, questioning how the direction of the monkey's movement (upward or downward) influences the acceleration of the mass and the tension in the rope.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the monkey's acceleration relative to the rope versus the table, questioning how this affects the tension and acceleration of the mass. They explore the relationship between the forces acting on the monkey and the resulting acceleration of the system.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different interpretations regarding the acceleration of the system based on the monkey's movement. Some participants express confusion over the textbook's explanation and seek clarification on the mechanics involved. Guidance has been offered regarding the need for free body diagrams to better understand the forces at play.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the ambiguity in the term "acceleration of the system," leading to confusion about what is being asked. There are references to external sources and examples that may not align perfectly with the current problem, highlighting the complexity of the situation.

  • #31
haruspex said:
How do you get that tension?
Remember that the sign errors in the snippet pasted in post #9 had the effect of swapping over the answers for b and c.
And tension for b) is T=M×a=80×2.4= 192N
Tension for c) is T=M×a=80×1.6=128N
49.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
It looks ok to me. I would just ask that you verify the "Free Body" you selected to write the equation

$$ - T + mg = m ( a - a_{rel}) $$

As a conceptual check of FBD's
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Iamconfused123
  • #33
PeroK said:
Part b) looks fine. For part c) I'm not sure how it's possible to accelerate down the rope with an acceleration greater than ##g##.
But in c) the monkey wouldn't be accelerating at greater than ##g##? Tension in the rope is still positive. If the monkey was still relative to the rope the acceleration of the table mass is ##2 \rm{m/s^2} \rightarrow##, with it moving down the rope the acceleration of the table mass is ##1.6 \rm{m/s^2} \rightarrow ##, giving the monkey an acceleration of ##3.6 \rm{m/s^2} \downarrow ## in the inertial frame.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Iamconfused123
  • #34
Iamconfused123 said:
And tension for b) is T=M×a=80×2.4= 192N
Tension for c) is T=M×a=80×1.6=128N
View attachment 337829
So does that resolve your question in post #26?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Iamconfused123
  • #35
The intutive answer is that the monkey accelerating up the rope with magnitude ##a## is equivalent to the monkey in a gravitational field of ##g +a##, as far as the block ##M## is concerned. The acceleration of bock ##M## is, therefore,$$a_M = \frac m{m+M}(g + a)$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Iamconfused123
  • #36
haruspex said:
So does that resolve your question in post #26?
It does, lol. Thank you for helping me. 😅
 
  • #37
erobz said:
But in c) the monkey wouldn't be accelerating at greater than ##g##? Tension in the rope is still positive. If the monkey was still relative to the rope the acceleration of the table mass is ##2 \rm{m/s^2} \rightarrow##, with it moving down the rope the acceleration of the table mass is ##1.6 \rm{m/s^2} \rightarrow ##, giving the monkey an acceleration of ##3.6 \rm{m/s^2} \downarrow ## in the inertial frame.
PeroK said:
The intutive answer is that the monkey accelerating up the rope with magnitude ##a## is equivalent to the monkey in a gravitational field of ##g +a##, as far as the block ##M## is concerned. The acceleration of bock ##M## is, therefore,$$a_M = \frac m{m+M}(g + a)$$

It took me a while to figure this out, but I did eventually. Thank you for helping me.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz
  • #38
I can now post this because the question has been answered. I think that a lot of clarity can be achieved if one were to do this symbolically.

From the FBD of the mass we have
##T=MA## where ##A## is the acceleration of the mass in the lab frame.
Note that ##A>0## and denotes the magnitude of the acceleration of the mass on the table.

From the FBD of the monkey we have ("up" is positive)
##T-mg = ma## where is ##a## is the acceleration 1d vector of the monkey also in the lab frame.
Note that ##a## can be positive, negative or zero. Now we put the two equations together to get $$MA=mg+ma.$$ Let ##a_0## be the magnitude of the monkey's acceleration relative to the rope. We have two cases

Case 1. The monkey is accelerating up relative to the rope and the rope is accelerating down relative to the lab.
Then ##a=-(A-a_0)## because the relative sign must be ##-## and the acceleration of the rope is "down".

Case 2. The monkey is accelerating down relative to the rope and the rope is accelerating down relative to the lab. Then ##a=-(A+a_0)## because the relative sign must be ##+## and the acceleration of the rope is "down".
Then we have $$\begin{align} & MA=mg+ma=mg-m(A\mp a_0) \nonumber \\
& \implies A=\frac{m(g\pm a_0)}{M+m}. \nonumber\end{align}$$ The upper sign goes with monkey relative acceleration up and the lower sign with monkey relative acceleration down.

Can the monkey accelerate up relative to the rope so that it is at rest in the lab frame? Yes, that happens when $$A=a_0=\frac{m(g+a_0)}{M+m}\implies a_0=\frac{m}{M}g.$$In this special case, the tension in the rope is $$T=MA=Ma_0=mg.$$ This makes sense. Only two forces act on the monkey and they must cancel in order to have the monkey's center of mass at rest in the lab frame.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Iamconfused123
  • #39
kuruman said:
Can the monkey accelerate up relative to the rope so that it is at rest in the lab frame?
@Iamconfused123, with a little nudging, solved that in post #26.
 
  • Care
Likes   Reactions: Iamconfused123

Similar threads

  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
895
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K