Monkey accelerating up and down a rope

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the dynamics of a monkey climbing a rope connected to a mass on a table, focusing on the effects of the monkey's acceleration on the system. It is debated whether the monkey's upward or downward acceleration results in greater acceleration of the mass M. The consensus is that when the monkey accelerates downward, it creates more tension in the rope, leading to greater acceleration of mass M compared to when the monkey accelerates upward. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding forces acting on the monkey and the system's center of mass, clarifying that the monkey's actions are internal interactions that do not affect the overall acceleration of the system. Ultimately, the complexities of the forces and accelerations involved in this scenario lead to confusion, emphasizing the need for careful analysis of free body diagrams and the definitions of system acceleration.
  • #31
haruspex said:
How do you get that tension?
Remember that the sign errors in the snippet pasted in post #9 had the effect of swapping over the answers for b and c.
And tension for b) is T=M×a=80×2.4= 192N
Tension for c) is T=M×a=80×1.6=128N
49.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
It looks ok to me. I would just ask that you verify the "Free Body" you selected to write the equation

$$ - T + mg = m ( a - a_{rel}) $$

As a conceptual check of FBD's
 
  • Like
Likes Iamconfused123
  • #33
PeroK said:
Part b) looks fine. For part c) I'm not sure how it's possible to accelerate down the rope with an acceleration greater than ##g##.
But in c) the monkey wouldn't be accelerating at greater than ##g##? Tension in the rope is still positive. If the monkey was still relative to the rope the acceleration of the table mass is ##2 \rm{m/s^2} \rightarrow##, with it moving down the rope the acceleration of the table mass is ##1.6 \rm{m/s^2} \rightarrow ##, giving the monkey an acceleration of ##3.6 \rm{m/s^2} \downarrow ## in the inertial frame.
 
  • Like
Likes Iamconfused123
  • #34
Iamconfused123 said:
And tension for b) is T=M×a=80×2.4= 192N
Tension for c) is T=M×a=80×1.6=128N
View attachment 337829
So does that resolve your question in post #26?
 
  • Like
Likes Iamconfused123
  • #35
The intutive answer is that the monkey accelerating up the rope with magnitude ##a## is equivalent to the monkey in a gravitational field of ##g +a##, as far as the block ##M## is concerned. The acceleration of bock ##M## is, therefore,$$a_M = \frac m{m+M}(g + a)$$
 
  • Like
Likes Iamconfused123
  • #36
haruspex said:
So does that resolve your question in post #26?
It does, lol. Thank you for helping me. 😅
 
  • #37
erobz said:
But in c) the monkey wouldn't be accelerating at greater than ##g##? Tension in the rope is still positive. If the monkey was still relative to the rope the acceleration of the table mass is ##2 \rm{m/s^2} \rightarrow##, with it moving down the rope the acceleration of the table mass is ##1.6 \rm{m/s^2} \rightarrow ##, giving the monkey an acceleration of ##3.6 \rm{m/s^2} \downarrow ## in the inertial frame.
PeroK said:
The intutive answer is that the monkey accelerating up the rope with magnitude ##a## is equivalent to the monkey in a gravitational field of ##g +a##, as far as the block ##M## is concerned. The acceleration of bock ##M## is, therefore,$$a_M = \frac m{m+M}(g + a)$$

It took me a while to figure this out, but I did eventually. Thank you for helping me.
 
  • #38
I can now post this because the question has been answered. I think that a lot of clarity can be achieved if one were to do this symbolically.

From the FBD of the mass we have
##T=MA## where ##A## is the acceleration of the mass in the lab frame.
Note that ##A>0## and denotes the magnitude of the acceleration of the mass on the table.

From the FBD of the monkey we have ("up" is positive)
##T-mg = ma## where is ##a## is the acceleration 1d vector of the monkey also in the lab frame.
Note that ##a## can be positive, negative or zero. Now we put the two equations together to get $$MA=mg+ma.$$ Let ##a_0## be the magnitude of the monkey's acceleration relative to the rope. We have two cases

Case 1. The monkey is accelerating up relative to the rope and the rope is accelerating down relative to the lab.
Then ##a=-(A-a_0)## because the relative sign must be ##-## and the acceleration of the rope is "down".

Case 2. The monkey is accelerating down relative to the rope and the rope is accelerating down relative to the lab. Then ##a=-(A+a_0)## because the relative sign must be ##+## and the acceleration of the rope is "down".
Then we have $$\begin{align} & MA=mg+ma=mg-m(A\mp a_0) \nonumber \\
& \implies A=\frac{m(g\pm a_0)}{M+m}. \nonumber\end{align}$$ The upper sign goes with monkey relative acceleration up and the lower sign with monkey relative acceleration down.

Can the monkey accelerate up relative to the rope so that it is at rest in the lab frame? Yes, that happens when $$A=a_0=\frac{m(g+a_0)}{M+m}\implies a_0=\frac{m}{M}g.$$In this special case, the tension in the rope is $$T=MA=Ma_0=mg.$$ This makes sense. Only two forces act on the monkey and they must cancel in order to have the monkey's center of mass at rest in the lab frame.
 
  • Like
Likes Iamconfused123
  • #39
kuruman said:
Can the monkey accelerate up relative to the rope so that it is at rest in the lab frame?
@Iamconfused123, with a little nudging, solved that in post #26.
 
  • Care
Likes Iamconfused123

Similar threads

  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
656
Replies
4
Views
561
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K