Monkey accelerating up and down a rope

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the dynamics of a monkey with a mass of 20 kg accelerating up and down a rope connected to a mass M of 80 kg, with no friction involved. Participants debate whether the monkey's upward or downward acceleration (2 m/s² relative to the rope) results in greater acceleration of mass M. The consensus is that the monkey's downward acceleration increases tension in the rope, leading to a greater net force and acceleration of mass M, contrary to initial assumptions that upward acceleration would yield greater results. The importance of understanding free body diagrams and the distinction between internal and external forces in the system is emphasized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with free body diagrams (FBD)
  • Basic knowledge of tension in pulley systems
  • Concept of acceleration in inertial frames
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the effects of tension in pulley systems using examples from classical mechanics
  • Learn to draw and analyze free body diagrams for complex systems
  • Explore the concept of the center of mass and its implications in dynamics
  • Investigate the role of friction in pulley systems and its effect on acceleration
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in mechanics, particularly those studying dynamics and forces in pulley systems.

  • #31
haruspex said:
How do you get that tension?
Remember that the sign errors in the snippet pasted in post #9 had the effect of swapping over the answers for b and c.
And tension for b) is T=M×a=80×2.4= 192N
Tension for c) is T=M×a=80×1.6=128N
49.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
It looks ok to me. I would just ask that you verify the "Free Body" you selected to write the equation

$$ - T + mg = m ( a - a_{rel}) $$

As a conceptual check of FBD's
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Iamconfused123
  • #33
PeroK said:
Part b) looks fine. For part c) I'm not sure how it's possible to accelerate down the rope with an acceleration greater than ##g##.
But in c) the monkey wouldn't be accelerating at greater than ##g##? Tension in the rope is still positive. If the monkey was still relative to the rope the acceleration of the table mass is ##2 \rm{m/s^2} \rightarrow##, with it moving down the rope the acceleration of the table mass is ##1.6 \rm{m/s^2} \rightarrow ##, giving the monkey an acceleration of ##3.6 \rm{m/s^2} \downarrow ## in the inertial frame.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Iamconfused123
  • #34
Iamconfused123 said:
And tension for b) is T=M×a=80×2.4= 192N
Tension for c) is T=M×a=80×1.6=128N
View attachment 337829
So does that resolve your question in post #26?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Iamconfused123
  • #35
The intutive answer is that the monkey accelerating up the rope with magnitude ##a## is equivalent to the monkey in a gravitational field of ##g +a##, as far as the block ##M## is concerned. The acceleration of bock ##M## is, therefore,$$a_M = \frac m{m+M}(g + a)$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Iamconfused123
  • #36
haruspex said:
So does that resolve your question in post #26?
It does, lol. Thank you for helping me. 😅
 
  • #37
erobz said:
But in c) the monkey wouldn't be accelerating at greater than ##g##? Tension in the rope is still positive. If the monkey was still relative to the rope the acceleration of the table mass is ##2 \rm{m/s^2} \rightarrow##, with it moving down the rope the acceleration of the table mass is ##1.6 \rm{m/s^2} \rightarrow ##, giving the monkey an acceleration of ##3.6 \rm{m/s^2} \downarrow ## in the inertial frame.
PeroK said:
The intutive answer is that the monkey accelerating up the rope with magnitude ##a## is equivalent to the monkey in a gravitational field of ##g +a##, as far as the block ##M## is concerned. The acceleration of bock ##M## is, therefore,$$a_M = \frac m{m+M}(g + a)$$

It took me a while to figure this out, but I did eventually. Thank you for helping me.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz
  • #38
I can now post this because the question has been answered. I think that a lot of clarity can be achieved if one were to do this symbolically.

From the FBD of the mass we have
##T=MA## where ##A## is the acceleration of the mass in the lab frame.
Note that ##A>0## and denotes the magnitude of the acceleration of the mass on the table.

From the FBD of the monkey we have ("up" is positive)
##T-mg = ma## where is ##a## is the acceleration 1d vector of the monkey also in the lab frame.
Note that ##a## can be positive, negative or zero. Now we put the two equations together to get $$MA=mg+ma.$$ Let ##a_0## be the magnitude of the monkey's acceleration relative to the rope. We have two cases

Case 1. The monkey is accelerating up relative to the rope and the rope is accelerating down relative to the lab.
Then ##a=-(A-a_0)## because the relative sign must be ##-## and the acceleration of the rope is "down".

Case 2. The monkey is accelerating down relative to the rope and the rope is accelerating down relative to the lab. Then ##a=-(A+a_0)## because the relative sign must be ##+## and the acceleration of the rope is "down".
Then we have $$\begin{align} & MA=mg+ma=mg-m(A\mp a_0) \nonumber \\
& \implies A=\frac{m(g\pm a_0)}{M+m}. \nonumber\end{align}$$ The upper sign goes with monkey relative acceleration up and the lower sign with monkey relative acceleration down.

Can the monkey accelerate up relative to the rope so that it is at rest in the lab frame? Yes, that happens when $$A=a_0=\frac{m(g+a_0)}{M+m}\implies a_0=\frac{m}{M}g.$$In this special case, the tension in the rope is $$T=MA=Ma_0=mg.$$ This makes sense. Only two forces act on the monkey and they must cancel in order to have the monkey's center of mass at rest in the lab frame.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Iamconfused123
  • #39
kuruman said:
Can the monkey accelerate up relative to the rope so that it is at rest in the lab frame?
@Iamconfused123, with a little nudging, solved that in post #26.
 
  • Care
Likes   Reactions: Iamconfused123

Similar threads

  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
868
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K