- #1
quasar_4
- 290
- 0
Homework Statement
A conducting ring with radius a and mass m is placed in a magnetic field at a height H above the origin of the reference frame. The plane of the ring is parallel to the ground, that is, the normal is directed along the z-axis. The electrical resistance per unit length of the ring is R/(2Pia), so that the resistance of the loop is R. The magnetic field has spatial dependence:
[tex]\vec{B} = \frac{B_0}{L}\left(-\frac{\rho}{2} \hat{\rho} + z \hat{z} \right)[/tex]
where [tex] \hat{\rho}, \hat{z} [/tex] are unit vectors in the usual cylindrical coordinate system.
At a certain time, the ring is dropped and falls due to gravity. The plane of the ring remains horizontal as the ring falls. Find the terminal velocity of the ring.
Homework Equations
We've got Maxwell's equations, F=ma, Lorentz force F=qv X B, etc.
The Attempt at a Solution
Here's my attempt so far:
[tex] \nabla \times \vec{E} = -\frac{\partial \vec{B}}{\partial t} \Rightarrow \oint{\vec{E} \cdot d\vec{l}} = -\frac{d}{dt} \int{\vec{B} \cdot \hat{n} \hspace{1mm} da} \Rightarrow E(2 \pi a) = -\frac{d}{dt} \int{B_z \hspace{1mm}da} \Rightarrow E(2 \pi a) = -\frac{d}{dt} \int_0^{2\pi}{d\phi}\int_0^a{B_z \rho\hspace{1mm} d\rho} = - \frac{B_0 a^2 \pi}{L}\frac{dz}{dt} [/tex]
But dz/dt is just the velocity we're looking for!
Here is where I am now stuck. I have a nice expression for the electric field, E, in terms of velocity, dz/dt =v:
[tex] \vec{E} = - \frac{B_0 \pi a v_z}{2L} \hat{\phi} [/tex]
But the electric field points in the circumferential direction, not the z direction. In terms of finding terminal velocity, I want something to the effect of
[tex] \sum F_z = -mg + F_? = ma [/tex], where F? is the net force in the z direction due to my induced electric field. From this point it is easy to set ma =0 and solve for v-terminal. But I can't just say something like F=qE, because E points in the wrong direction.
Furthermore, I haven't at all used the fact that the ring is at a height H or that it has resistance R - are those unnecessary bits of information, or am I approaching this entirely wrong? I almost could solve this using conservation of energy, but it's the terminal velocity I want and not clear to me how to find that in an energy formulation of the problem (might be possible, though). So - can anyone help?