Terminology in rotational kinematics: distance vs displacement

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the terminology of distance and displacement in the context of rotational kinematics, particularly comparing it to linear kinematics. The original poster seeks clarification on how these concepts apply when a wheel turns a specific number of revolutions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definitions of distance and displacement in rotational motion, questioning whether the concepts align with those in linear motion. There is discussion about the implications of angular displacement and the effects of multiple revolutions on these definitions.

Discussion Status

Some participants affirm the original poster's understanding while others elaborate on the nuances of angular displacement and position. The conversation reflects varying interpretations of the terms and their applications, indicating a productive exploration of the topic without reaching a definitive consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential ambiguity in defining angular position and displacement, especially in scenarios involving multiple revolutions. There is also mention of how these concepts are typically taught, suggesting a need for clarity in educational contexts.

JeanJean
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to learn some physics on my own, using the internet as my main source of information.
Now, I'm a bit confused about some terminology, and I can't find anything about it...

Distance vs displacement in rotational kinematics!

Is there a similar difference as in linear kinematics?

If a wheel turns 2.5 revolutions, would it be:
distance = 2.5 rev
displacement = 0.5 rev

Thank you for your help :cool:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your understanding is correct. Even if one rarely uses the idea of "distance" in rotational kinematics, and the "displacement" is usually simply "the angle".
 
voko said:
Your understanding is correct. Even if one rarely uses the idea of "distance" in rotational kinematics, and the "displacement" is usually simply "the angle".
Isn't the angular displacement = 2.5 rev ?
 
Any displacement is the difference between some start and some end position. Even though there can be a kazillion revolutions done in between.
 
voko said:
Any displacement is the difference between some start and some end position. Even though there can be a kazillion revolutions done in between.

My understanding is that the angular position at the end will reflect the number of revolutions.

If, for example, you use the equations for constant angular accceleration, the angular displacement can easily be more than 1 revolution.
 
This is complicated by the ambiguity in the angular position. Add ## 2 \pi ## to any position, it is still the same position.

The difference between angular distance and angular displacement is most obvious when the body under consideration never makes a complete revolution but goes back in forth.
 
voko said:
This is complicated by the ambiguity in the angular position. Add ## 2 \pi ## to any position, it is still the same position.
This would appear to be clear, but if you're using the equations for constant angular acceleration you have a problem.
For example, let
Δθ = (1.0 rev/s)t
For any t>1s, the angular displacement must be >1.0rev
 
I see it is all a matter of interpretation and/or definition...

But... isn't there some 'official definition' ?
How is this taught in school ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 138 ·
5
Replies
138
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
7K