Terminology issue regarding modules and representations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the representation of the group algebra FS4 and its corresponding module V. It is established that V is indeed F^3, which aligns with the representation mapping FS4 to 3x3 matrices over the field F. The initial confusion arose from a misinterpretation of the characteristic of the field, which is confirmed to be 0, not 4. The representation provides a homomorphism from S_4 into GL(F^3), confirming the FS4-module structure on F^3.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group algebras, specifically FS4.
  • Familiarity with representation theory and its applications.
  • Knowledge of linear algebra, particularly 3x3 matrices.
  • Concept of module structures over fields.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of group algebras in representation theory.
  • Learn about homomorphisms in the context of GL(n, F) for various n.
  • Explore the implications of module structures in algebra.
  • Investigate the characteristics of fields and their impact on algebraic structures.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those focused on algebra and representation theory, as well as students seeking to deepen their understanding of group algebras and module theory.

Office_Shredder
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,706
Reaction score
1,592

Homework Statement


Given a field F, FS4 is a group algebra... we have a representation X that maps FS4 to 3x3 matrices over (presumably) F. Let V denote the FS4 module corresponding to X... do stuff. My question is, what the heck is V supposed to be?

I assumed that V is F3, but that seemingly contradicts what the question wants me to do. So is V the free module of the representation of FS4 over itself (and then why bother having a representation)? I can't think of what else it could be

The full question can be found at

http://www.maths.ox.ac.uk/courses/2008/part-b/b2-algebra/b2a-introduction-representation-theory/materialsheet 5, question 3

EDIT: I was wrong... if V=F3 the question's conclusion is correct. For some reason I was associating the 4 in S4 with F instead, and thought it had characteristic 4... I noticed my error when I realized a) it has characteristic 0 b) 4 isn't the characteristic of a field. Good job by me wasting an hour working in a non-existent field
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well the representation gives us a homomorphism from S_4 into GL(F^3). The induced action of the algebra FS_4 on F^3 induces an FS_4-module structure on F^3. So yes, V=F^3.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
8K