Testing Self-Awareness: How Do We Know?

  • Context: Medical 
  • Thread starter Thread starter daniel_i_l
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Testing
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the philosophical and practical implications of determining self-awareness in humans versus advanced computers. Participants argue that until a life-like android is created, the assumption remains that beings appearing self-aware are indeed human. The conversation highlights the challenge of proving self-awareness, suggesting that a self-aware computer could be validated through isolated responses to questions, eliminating external influences. Ultimately, the dialogue questions the value of pursuing self-aware machines if their consciousness cannot be definitively proven.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of artificial intelligence concepts
  • Familiarity with philosophical theories of consciousness
  • Knowledge of Turing Test principles
  • Basic comprehension of computer programming and response generation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Turing Test and its implications for AI self-awareness
  • Explore philosophical literature on consciousness and self-awareness
  • Investigate advancements in robotics and the development of life-like androids
  • Examine case studies of AI systems that generate human-like responses
USEFUL FOR

Philosophers, AI researchers, computer scientists, and anyone interested in the intersection of technology and consciousness.

daniel_i_l
Gold Member
Messages
864
Reaction score
0
How do you know that other people are self-aware and not just very sophisticated computers? In other words, let's say you had a box with something inside that gave answers to your questions, how could you ever tell if the thing in the box was self-aware? If it's impossible then what's the point of talking about making computers that are self-aware if it's you can never prove that they are or are not?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
"How do you know that other people are self-aware and not just very sophisticated computers?"
Until the day I meet a life-like android (or read that someone invented a life-like android), I will assume that all beings who appear to be self-aware, ARE actually self-aware human beings.

"lets say you had a box with something inside that gave answers to your questions, how could you ever tell if the thing in the box was self-aware?"
This sounds like a good definition of a Forum.
I type-out a question.
I send it to the Physics Forum.
Later, my computer screen comes back with an answer.
Certainly the answer could be self-generated by a computer program.
If the answer was clear and on-point, I wouldn't care if it came from a human (or not).

"If it's impossible [to tell the difference] then what's the point of talking about making computers that are self-aware if you can never prove that they are or are not?"
If I had a computer that was self-aware, it would be a simple matter to prove that it existed:
Input a question, and it outputs an answer.
Prove to a bystander that there is no external connection to a modem.
This will convince most people that the computer, itself, has output the answer.
If some scientist was still skeptical, I might show him the schematic of my design, and explain how my computer works. Then he would methodically go through the computer, attempting to hunt-down the secret modem. At some point, he would be convinced. Soon thereafter, I will win the Nobel Prize, and this will help convince the rest of the world that I have (indeed) created a self-aware computer.

It is impossible for a human to live in a Vacuum.
There is a Vacuum between the Earth and moon.
Therefore, what's the point of a Space program.

There is impossible ... and then there is IMPOSSIBLE.
 
Last edited:
put it infront of a mirror for a while.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K