I "Testing the black-hole area law with GW150914"

  • Thread starter Thread starter robphy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Law
Click For Summary
The discussion highlights the observational confirmation of Hawking's black-hole area theorem using data from the gravitational wave event GW150914. Researchers achieved a 97% probability agreement with the theorem when including overtones in their model of the ringdown phase. A new time-domain analysis of pre- and post-merger data was employed to reach these conclusions. Additionally, the inspiral and ringdown phases of the signal were found to be consistent with the same remnant mass and spin, supporting general relativity. This research represents a significant advancement in understanding black hole physics.
robphy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
7,308
Reaction score
2,819
(I haven't been actively following this line of research... but I think it is possibly interesting reading.
It's been in the science news today.)

"Black Hole Area Law Tested" (synopsis)
https://physics.aps.org/articles/v14/s87

"Testing the Black-Hole Area Law with GW150914"
Maximiliano Isi, Will M. Farr, Matthew Giesler, Mark A. Scheel, and Saul A. Teukolsky
Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 011103 – Published 1 July 2021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.011103 (preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.04486 )
We present observational confirmation of Hawking’s black-hole area theorem based on data from GW150914, finding agreement with the prediction with 97% (95%) probability when we model the ringdown including (excluding) overtones of the quadrupolar mode. We obtain this result from a new time-domain analysis of the pre- and postmerger data. We also confirm that the inspiral and ringdown portions of the signal are consistent with the same remnant mass and spin, in agreement with general relativity.
 
  • Like
Likes yucheng, Omega0, vanhees71 and 2 others
Moderator's note: Spin-off from another thread due to topic change. In the second link referenced, there is a claim about a physical interpretation of frame field. Consider a family of observers whose worldlines fill a region of spacetime. Each of them carries a clock and a set of mutually orthogonal rulers. Each observer points in the (timelike) direction defined by its worldline's tangent at any given event along it. What about the rulers each of them carries ? My interpretation: each...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
506
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 388 ·
13
Replies
388
Views
175K
Replies
24
Views
8K