Testing Time Dilation: Atomic Clocks in Jet Aircraft Experiment Results

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the 1971 experiment involving four portable atomic clocks flown around the world to test time dilation predictions of relativity. The westbound plane, flying at an average speed of 1500 km/h, would need to fly for approximately 31,688 years to lose 1 second relative to a ground clock, indicating a miscalculation in the user's approach. The actual observed discrepancy of 273 nanoseconds from the experiment led to a calculated average speed of 1226.2 m/s, which the user questions due to its feasibility in 1971. The discussion highlights the necessity of considering Earth's rotation when calculating time dilation effects.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's theory of relativity
  • Familiarity with atomic clock technology
  • Basic knowledge of time dilation calculations
  • Proficiency in solving equations involving speed and distance
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of Earth's rotation on time dilation calculations
  • Learn about the principles of special relativity and time dilation
  • Explore advanced topics in atomic clock technology and precision measurement
  • Investigate historical experiments related to time dilation, such as the Hafele-Keating experiment
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, aerospace engineers, students of relativity, and anyone interested in the practical applications of time dilation in modern technology.

KyleS4562
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
In 1971 four portable atomic clocks were flown around the world in jet aircraft, two east bound and two westbound, to test the times dilation predictions of relativity. a) If the westbound plane flew at an average speed of 1500 km/h relative to the surface, how long would it have to fly for the clock on board to lose 1s relative to the reference clock on the ground? b) In the actual experiment the plane circumflew Earth once and the observed discrepancy of the clocks was 273ns. What was the plane's average speed?

For the first part, I convereted 1500km/h to 416.6m/s, then put it terms of c, or 1.389x10^-6c. I then took the standard equation t'/(sqrt(1-(1.389x10^-6c)^2)/c^2) = t.
I then made t-t'=1, solved for t'=-1+t and put that into the equation.
Solving, I got 1x10^12 s, or 31,688 years. Is this a reasonable answer?

I think my method would be wrong, because I followed similar steps to get b. After removing the t' prime from the equation as I did in part a, I set t = 40075160m/v, 40075160m being the circumference of the earth. My equation was as follows:
(1/(sqrt(1-(v^2/c^2)))*(-273x10^-9s + 40075160/v) = 40075160/v

I solved for v, but got 1226.2 m/s, which is a speed I don't believe we've even held for a sustained flight now, let alone in 1971. Where am I going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
for part a, it seems reasonable. It would take quite a long time to get a 1s discrepancy.

For part b, are you taking into account that the Earth rotates (and that the planes fly in opposite directions)?
 
No i did not. I will try that. But would I have to consider the Earth's rotation in part a as well?
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 115 ·
4
Replies
115
Views
9K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K