Testosterone in males and females

  • Thread starter Thread starter mark!
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the differences in testosterone secretion and brain activation between males and females in response to conflict. It is established that testosterone levels in males range significantly higher than in females, with women experiencing levels between 15 to 70 ng/dL. The gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) is identified as the primary initiator of testosterone production, and the amygdala's role in emotional responses is highlighted, particularly in females during specific scenarios. The conversation also touches on the importance of referencing credible sources, such as NIH and PubMed, for substantiating claims regarding neurobiology and behavior.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of testosterone levels and their physiological implications
  • Familiarity with the role of the amygdala in emotional processing
  • Knowledge of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) function
  • Ability to critically evaluate scientific literature and sources
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of testosterone on male and female behavior in various contexts
  • Explore the role of the amygdala in emotional responses across genders
  • Investigate the physiological effects of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) on hormone levels
  • Learn about current studies on neurobiology and gender differences in threat response
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for neuroscientists, psychologists, medical professionals, and anyone interested in the biological underpinnings of gender differences in behavior and hormone regulation.

mark!
Messages
150
Reaction score
13
Is it true that:

- If there’s a site of conflict, shown to males and females, the amygdala is more likely to be activated in females?
- In males, when viewing conflict, testosterone (which is bound to particular brain structures) is secreted, which does not occur in females?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Hmm. Where did you get the information used to generate your questions? If it was from a responsible source, then I probably can find a research paper on it.
BTW:If you use NIH or pubmed as the site to search, you get pretty good references.
I did that. I do not see very much to substantiate either assertion.

However. This not my area of knowledge. So I looked around further.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3693622/

This is a review article - that means they did a lot of reading and tried to put together reasonable answers about testosterone and behavior. It does not seem to have much to assert there are answers to your set of questions. There is variation in levels of testosterone secretion in men. Women normally have testosterone at much lower levels than do men, 15 to 70 ng/dL, which is a wide range. There are medical conditions in women, like Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome, in which women have above normal male hormone levels and may develop male traits like hirsutism. Which means they may grow facial hair, for example.

So what I am saying is there are varying physiological responses in men and women and ranges for normal hormone levels. And normal levels are broad and are age-related. Which means that 'teststerone-mediated' behavior is not simple.

The gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) is the primary "on-switch" to initiate the production of testosterone. Synthesis/release of the hormone does not appear to be related as a reaction to visual stimulus, AFAIK.

As far as the amygdala question, I pass. There are PF members who know much more than I do. Maybe @DiracPool or @Pythagorean might have something to say.
 
Thanks for your research!

I got this information from neuroscientist professor Jeanette Norden (Ph.D. Vanderbilt University). It's 10 year old information, and a lot has changed since of course, but a finding like this, being a experimental measurement, that turns out to be completely false, seems rather unlikely to me. Because how could it have been measured in the first place? That's why I came to this forum, because she didn't provide any evidence to her statement.
 
Last edited:
Well, I am on your side so far. It may have been some kind of clinical observation that Dr. Norden has found. She is a clinical neurologist I believe.
I would simply go with the assertion she made - assuming you got the information from the online course. There should be some associated reading material - like a textbook, some technical papers - something that you can use to corroborate the statements if you want to dig into it more.

And it is good that you have enough interest to try to get the current known information. Neurobiology is rapidly developing.
 
Males are the most viligant when it comes to threats. I would take the leap to state that their brains are slightly more aware of the threat that other males pose, so we would see different areas (related to threat reponse) being more active under imaging under certain situations.

Females have been shown to have activity in the fear/submission areas of the brain during intercourse. It is true that the amygdala is involved in that situation. But I would say the males brain may be more or at least equally active under a threat.

Males secret testosterone under many circumstances, so that would not surprise me.

As a side note, I would be interested in finding out if males choose their footwear depending on the ability to respond to a threat. Seems so.
 
Fervent Freyja said:
As a side note, I would be interested in finding out if males choose their footwear depending on the ability to respond to a threat. Seems so.

I haven't looked for any studies on this but I can say that for myself I am very aware of choosing footwear that enable me to run. For this reason I cannot wear flip-flops or sandals.

Cheers
 
cosmik debris said:
I haven't looked for any studies on this but I can say that for myself I am very aware of choosing footwear that enable me to run. For this reason I cannot wear flip-flops or sandals.

Cheers

Yes. I would wonder how they would control for whether the decision is determined by masculine/cultural beliefs or if the footwear is chosen for the practical ability to fight or run?
 
Fervent Freyja said:
Males are the most viligant when it comes to threats. I would take the leap to state that their brains are slightly more aware of the threat that other males pose, so we would see different areas (related to threat reponse) being more active under imaging under certain situations.

Females have been shown to have activity in the fear/submission areas of the brain during intercourse. It is true that the amygdala is involved in that situation. But I would say the males brain may be more or at least equally active under a threat.

Please remember to post references supporting your statements, Freyja. It is incredibly important to always have a good reference when discussing biology and medicine, as the human body is insanely complex and most "facts" people have about it end up being wrong.

Fervent Freyja said:
As a side note, I would be interested in finding out if males choose their footwear depending on the ability to respond to a threat. Seems so.

I seriously doubt men choose their footwear to respond to "threats". It is far more likely that men choose their footwear to be appropriate for their job (work boots, dress shoes for a suit, etc), to be appropriate for socializing (my Nike Airmax), or to be comfortable (my dad's house shoes).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu and berkeman
Drakkith said:
I seriously doubt men choose their footwear to respond to "threats". It is far more likely that men choose their footwear to be appropriate for their job (work boots, dress shoes for a suit, etc), to be appropriate for socializing (my Nike Airmax), or to be comfortable (my dad's house shoes).

Yes, Drakkith, I will remember to continue citing my references. No problem watching my own back on here, whatsoever.

I was just throwing the footwear idea out there from observations I've made and as a scientist-in-training would love to see the scientific method applied to my hypothesis. How science get's done, you know? :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G
  • #10
Fervent Freyja said:
Yes, Drakkith, I will remember to continue citing my references. No problem watching my own back on here, whatsoever.

I was just throwing the footwear idea out there from observations I've made and as a scientist-in-training would love to see the scientific method applied to my hypothesis. How science get's done, you know? :)

I've thought about this too. As I said before I am definitely one of those people who choose clothing that would enable me to deal with threats. I'm sure there are many factors involved, types of activities one is involved in, living in a country prone to earthquakes or a country with political uncertainties. I can't imagine living in Syria and going out in high heels, although I'm sure some do.

Cheers
 
  • #11
cosmik debris said:
I've thought about this too. As I said before I am definitely one of those people who choose clothing that would enable me to deal with threats. I'm sure there are many factors involved, types of activities one is involved in, living in a country prone to earthquakes or a country with political uncertainties. I can't imagine living in Syria and going out in high heels, although I'm sure some do.

Cheers

Also, men are more at risk for being harmed by other men, it would seem to make them more aware. By large, universally, women tend to group together. Gender shouldn't make too much of a difference in ability to respond to a threat. Being the smallest on the playground means you can run and move the fastest with practice...
 
  • #12
Fervent Freyja said:
Being the smallest on the playground means you can run and move the fastest with practice...
Ummm... How many short-legged Sprinters have won medals competing with the taller versions?
 
  • #13
Tom.G said:
Ummm... How many short-legged Sprinters have won medals competing with the taller versions?

You're so right. I was referring to the average playground, where you can practice chasing a taller one freestyle everyday. I really only could catch many of them by learning how they moved and using it to my advantage... You're right.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K