Texas A&M or Texas Tech Honors for undergraduate?

AI Thread Summary
Choosing between Texas A&M and Texas Tech's Honors College involves weighing prestige against specific academic opportunities. Texas A&M is generally viewed as more prestigious, but Texas Tech offers advantages like priority class selection and research opportunities. Graduate school admissions prioritize GPA and relevant coursework over institutional prestige. Concerns about smaller schools lacking research opportunities and adequate preparation for graduate studies are noted. Ultimately, the decision should consider the intensity of the curriculum and the alignment with future academic goals.
Trippsapientae
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have the opportunity to attend both universities. Obviously Texas a&m is a more respected college on the face value, but what about the Tech honors college? Does that change the 'prestige' and chance of graduate school admissions?

Also, Is it better to have a higher GPA at a less prestigious institution or vice versa?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Prestige doesn't get you into grad school.

If you can't get a high GPA at any undergraduate institution, grad school will prove difficult.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Prestige doesn't get you into grad school.

If you can't get a high GPA at any undergraduate institution, grad school will prove difficult.
So why shouldn't I go to UT Permian Basin and get a full ride?
 
Trippsapientae said:
So why shouldn't I go to UT Permian Basin and get a full ride?

Why not indeed.
 
Sorry, I'm a bit lost. Many people have given me many different forms of advice. I am enrolling in the Spring and am therefore limited in my options. I've heard that many of the smaller schools seem to usually lack the research opportunities that are looked at by graduate schools & many of the graduates struggle due to insufficient preparation.

Due to my circumstances I am stuck between these two colleges (Tech Honors college & Texas A&M) and would just like to make the best decision. The folks at Tech would give me priority class choices and first chances at research, but the staff at A&M pointed out many classes that Tech's program is 'missing' that grad schools would look for. (Advanced/ Quantum Mech II, Exptl. Phys). Overall the A&M curriculum seems more intense also more tight.

I am genuinely stuck in the middle and any advice would be appreciated.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top