The Basics Regarding : Planetary Orbits and Whatnot

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the nature of planetary orbits, specifically why they tend to be elliptical rather than circular, and the shape of galaxies, particularly why they are often disc-shaped instead of spherical. Participants explore these concepts through theoretical reasoning and speculative ideas, touching on aspects of general relativity, gravitational dynamics, and the historical formation of galaxies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that elliptical orbits arise because objects often do not start in circular orbits, leading to elliptical paths over time.
  • It is noted that a circle is a special case of an ellipse, suggesting that circular orbits are unlikely due to various perturbations in gravitational systems.
  • Participants discuss the dynamics of galaxy shapes, mentioning that not all galaxies are disc-shaped and that their shapes depend on their formation history.
  • One participant suggests that centrifugal force contributes to the flattening of galaxies, while another points out that galaxies consist of many separate objects, complicating this idea.
  • Frame dragging effects due to distance from central masses and the finite speed of light are mentioned as factors that prevent perfectly circular orbits.
  • Concerns are raised about the clarity of certain points, such as how objects on different planes could collide and the dynamics of gravity pulling objects toward a central plane.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express curiosity and uncertainty about the topics discussed, with no clear consensus reached on the reasons behind elliptical orbits or the specific dynamics of galaxy shapes. Multiple competing views and interpretations remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants acknowledge the complexity of the mathematics involved in general relativity and the dynamics of orbits and galaxy formation, indicating that a deeper understanding may be necessary to fully grasp the concepts discussed.

JulianBoolean
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Q: Why is it that objects in orbit around other objects, tend to do that in elliptical patterns, and not circular patterns? I can picture objects of great mass, planets and stars warping the fabric of space time, and how moons and whatnot get caught spinning in the orbit. But can't wrap my head around the elliptical aspect of the deal.

Q: Why is it that our galaxy is (very loosely speaking) disc shaped? I can picture how the spiral arms are created from the spin, and I can picture how the black hole at the center (perhaps with the aid of dark matter) keeps everything together. But why is it pancake-like, rather than sphere-like, in shape?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
That is a good question, I hope that someone answers it, I would like to know that one myself.

More than likely though it probably takes a deep understanding of the mathematics of general relativity. Maybe someone here can explain it simply though.

If I had to guess though I would say that it has to do with the fact that things many times don't start out in circular orbits, so they end up as ellipses.
 
Q1: A circle is just a special case of an ellipse, so a circular orbit would still be elliptical. Being such a special case would be unlikely given all the things that work to cause orbits to not be perfect (such as Jupiter).

Q2: There are some complicated dynamics at work, but a couple of easy to visualize issues:
1. If the objects were on different planes, they would collide with each other.
2. If a big cloud is rotating uniformly, the objects way above it would just be making little circles, they wouldn't be orbiting the center.
3. If objects orbit above or below the plane, the gravity of the plane will tend to pull them toward the plane.
 
JulianBoolean said:
... But why is it pancake-like, rather than sphere-like, in shape?
...

What Russ said. Plus you should know that not all galaxies are disk shape. Not every galaxy looks like a pancake.

How a galaxy turns out depends to some extent on its past history---the circumstances under which it formed. There is a lot to this topic. It is an interesting question, how galaxies get their various shapes.
 
Forestman said:
That is a good question, I hope that someone answers it, I would like to know that one myself. More than likely though it probably takes a deep understanding of the mathematics of general relativity. Maybe someone here can explain it simply though. If I had to guess though I would say that it has to do with the fact that things many times don't start out in circular orbits, so they end up as ellipses.

Forestman, Thanks that got me thinking on the right track. :)

marcus said:
What Russ said. Plus you should know that not all galaxies are disk shape. Not every galaxy looks like a pancake.How a galaxy turns out depends to some extent on its past history---the circumstances under which it formed. There is a lot to this topic. It is an interesting question, how galaxies get their various shapes.

Cool, I thought all galaxies were disc shaped. Is is possible to say that most are?

russ_watters said:
Q1: A circle is just a special case of an ellipse, so a circular orbit would still be elliptical. Being such a special case would be unlikely given all the things that work to cause orbits to not be perfect (such as Jupiter).

Q2: There are some complicated dynamics at work, but a couple of easy to visualize issues:
1. If the objects were on different planes, they would collide with each other.
2. If a big cloud is rotating uniformly, the objects way above it would just be making little circles, they wouldn't be orbiting the center.
3. If objects orbit above or below the plane, the gravity of the plane will tend to pull them toward the plane.

Q1 : I think my thought experiment was correct to a certain point, but flawed at the very end. Planets are round, and the fabric of space time is being deformed around it, which implies that the fabric of space time around a round planet will be circular not elliptical. However, just because the fabric of space might be circular, it doesn't meant that object must follow the warp shape. I'm picturing a bowling ball on the center a trampoline. Shoot a marble at just about any trajectory and it's going to follow an ellipse. Getting a perfectly circular orbit would be possible, but you'd have to shoot it at just the right speed and direction.

Q2 : Still struggling with that one a bit. Can't really grasp the three things you are pointing to

Point 1 : Seems like maybe a typo? How would objects on dif planes collide?
Point 2 : Not getting that at all.
Point 3 : Well that would certainly do it. I can accept that new info (gravity at the center plane is stronger) at face value, but kinda curious as to how that happens? And is it the same phenomena that have forced the rings of Saturn and Jupiter to the center?

Thanks! awesome conversation, much appreciated

-Julian
 
Just a small point on your Q1: Your planet may be 'round', but it may not be *spherical* due to rotation, tectonic mass distribution, solar tides etc etc. The effect of these, plus axial tilt etc etc mean that even a perfectly circular initial orbit will soon become slightly elliptical...
 
Centrifugal force always tends to flatten things doesn't it? I would assume galaxies to be flat due to that force.
 
Look here for information on types of galaxies.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy_morphological_classification"

The most basic division is spiral/disk galaxies and spherical galaxies, but the classifications shown in the link are more detailed.

Also there are irregular galaxies, ones that have randomish shapes. The two Magellanic Clouds are notable examples. Though the Magellanic Clouds have been found to be a sort of hybrid of irregular and spiral types.
redwood973 said:
Centrifugal force always tends to flatten things doesn't it? I would assume galaxies to be flat due to that force.
Well, that's more for solid objects. Galaxies are several separate objects.
I would also like to point out that a few of the exosolar systems we've discovered seem to have planetary orbits not on the same plane as our solar system, though I can't think of any specific examples.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Due to distance from the central mass and the finite speed of light, all orbital bodies are subject to frame dragging effects. This forbids perfectly circular orbits.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K