╔(σ_σ)╝
- 838
- 2
It was amusing...nismaratwork said:Somehow that missed being funny and just hit 'disturbing'. I never need to read the words, "fecal," or, "buttocks," for a LONG time.
The discussion revolves around the methods of using toilet paper, specifically whether folding or scrunching is the better approach. Participants explore various techniques, personal preferences, and the implications of each method in the context of hygiene and efficiency.
Participants do not reach a consensus on whether folding or scrunching is superior, with multiple competing views and personal preferences expressed throughout the discussion.
Participants' claims are based on personal experiences and preferences, with no definitive conclusions drawn regarding the effectiveness or efficiency of either method.
It was amusing...nismaratwork said:Somehow that missed being funny and just hit 'disturbing'. I never need to read the words, "fecal," or, "buttocks," for a LONG time.
╔(σ_σ)╝ said:It was amusing...
Yeah!Borg said:Mine doesn't fold or scrunch.
![]()
FtlIsAwesome said:Yeah!
You are the man!
DaveC426913 said:What I don't get about scrunchers is this:
What happens after the first pass? You can't simply re-fold. Basically, a scrunched wad is a one-use wad.
Exactly. Very wasteful of materials, not to mention hard on toilet systems and wallets.FtlIsAwesome said:Uhh...
Use another piece.
BobG said:It's tough to make up your mind which method you should use sometimes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPOX6R7RvBM
Bah humbug.DaveC426913 said:Very wasteful of materials, not to mention hard on toilet systems and wallets.