╔(σ_σ)╝
- 838
- 2
It was amusing...nismaratwork said:Somehow that missed being funny and just hit 'disturbing'. I never need to read the words, "fecal," or, "buttocks," for a LONG time.
The forum discussion centers on the debate between folding and scrunching toilet paper, with participants sharing their personal preferences and methods. Key techniques mentioned include the "wrap and withdraw method" and the "Polish Method," which emphasize efficiency and cleanliness. A significant point raised is the environmental impact of toilet paper usage, with statistics highlighting that Americans use 23 kg per person annually compared to 1.8 kg in Asia. The conversation also touches on the importance of toilet paper orientation and its implications for pet owners.
PREREQUISITESThis discussion is beneficial for individuals interested in personal hygiene, environmental sustainability, and cultural practices related to toiletry use. It is particularly relevant for those seeking efficient methods for everyday tasks.
It was amusing...nismaratwork said:Somehow that missed being funny and just hit 'disturbing'. I never need to read the words, "fecal," or, "buttocks," for a LONG time.
╔(σ_σ)╝ said:It was amusing...
Yeah!Borg said:Mine doesn't fold or scrunch.
![]()
FtlIsAwesome said:Yeah!
You are the man!
DaveC426913 said:What I don't get about scrunchers is this:
What happens after the first pass? You can't simply re-fold. Basically, a scrunched wad is a one-use wad.
Exactly. Very wasteful of materials, not to mention hard on toilet systems and wallets.FtlIsAwesome said:Uhh...
Use another piece.
BobG said:It's tough to make up your mind which method you should use sometimes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPOX6R7RvBM
Bah humbug.DaveC426913 said:Very wasteful of materials, not to mention hard on toilet systems and wallets.