The Binomial Series: Extending the Validity?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PFuser1232
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Binomial Series
PFuser1232
Messages
479
Reaction score
20
The binomial series ##(1 + x)^n = 1 + nx + \frac{n(n-1)}{2!} x^2 + ...## only converges for ##|x| < 1## right?
Is it true that writing ##(1 + x)^n## differently (i.e. ##x^n (1 + \frac{1}{x})^n##) extends the validity of this series to include values of ##x## such that ##|x| > 1##?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
MohammedRady97 said:
The binomial series (1+x)n=1+nx+n(n−1)2!x2+...(1 + x)^n = 1 + nx + \frac{n(n-1)}{2!} x^2 + ... only converges for |x|<1|x| < 1 right?
No. A binomial series is only defined for a given n, Whatever the value of x, there exists an N such that [itex]nx>1000[/itex] for n>N.
MohammedRady97 said:
Is it true that writing (1+x)n(1 + x)^n differently (i.e. xn(1+1x)nx^n (1 + \frac{1}{x})^n) extends the validity of this series to include values of xx such that |x|>1|x| > 1?
No.
 
MohammedRady97 said:
The binomial series ##(1 + x)^n = 1 + nx + \frac{n(n-1)}{2!} x^2 + ...## only converges for ##|x| < 1## right?

Yes. Although the series might converge for more values than just ##|x|<1##. Complete details are here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_series#Conditions_for_convergence

Is it true that writing ##(1 + x)^n## differently (i.e. ##x^n (1 + \frac{1}{x})^n##) extends the validity of this series to include values of ##x## such that ##|x| > 1##?

Yes, If ##|x|>1##, then your trick can be used. If ##|x|<1##, then your trick doesn't work, but the original series does of course. If ##|x|=1## then the situation is a bit annoying.
 
Svein said:
No. A binomial series is only defined for a given n, Whatever the value of x, there exists an N such that [itex]nx>1000[/itex] for n>N.

No.

micromass said:
Yes. Although the series might converge for more values than just ##|x|<1##. Complete details are here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_series#Conditions_for_convergence
Yes, If ##|x|>1##, then your trick can be used. If ##|x|<1##, then your trick doesn't work, but the original series does of course. If ##|x|=1## then the situation is a bit annoying.

Interesting. I once watched a video in which someone proves that the sum of all natural numbers is ##-\frac{1}{12}##, and in one of the steps, he substituted ##x = 1## into the binomial series. Apparently, anything is possible if you're Euler!
 
MohammedRady97 said:
Interesting. I once watched a video in which someone proves that the sum of all natural numbers is ##-\frac{1}{12}##, and in one of the steps, he substituted ##x = 1## into the binomial series. Apparently, anything is possible if you're Euler!

Yes, that is valid, but only under conditions. For the standard convergence of series, plugging in ##x=1## is forbidden. But there are other definitions where series do not converge how we they usually do. Under those definitions, you do get ##-1/12##.
 
micromass said:
Yes, that is valid, but only under conditions. For the standard convergence of series, plugging in ##x=1## is forbidden. But there are other definitions where series do not converge how we they usually do. Under those definitions, you do get ##-1/12##.

Is it possible to approximate ##\sqrt{2}## using the binomial series?
 
Yes, but not directly. What you can do (for example) is to use ##x=-1/2## to approximate ##1/\sqrt{2} = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}##. And then you can easily find ##\sqrt{2}##.

Edit: I guess you can even do it directly, but convergence won't be very rapid.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PFuser1232

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K