The circumference of an ellipse

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter deep838
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circumference Ellipse
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The circumference of an ellipse cannot be simplified to the formula π*(a+b), where a and b represent the major and minor axes, due to the geometric properties of ellipses. A more accurate approximation involves a correction factor, particularly for highly eccentric ellipses, which can be expressed as π(a+b) multiplied by approximately 1.27. This correction factor accounts for the elliptical shape, especially when one axis is significantly larger than the other. The discussion highlights the complexity of deriving an exact formula for the circumference of an ellipse, referencing resources such as Paul Bourke's geometry page and Wikipedia.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic geometry concepts, particularly ellipses
  • Familiarity with mathematical notation and expressions
  • Knowledge of approximation techniques in mathematics
  • Ability to interpret correction factors in mathematical formulas
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of the circumference formula for ellipses
  • Explore the concept of eccentricity in ellipses and its impact on circumference
  • Learn about approximation methods in geometry, specifically for curves
  • Study the relationship between the circumference and area of ellipses
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, geometry enthusiasts, students studying advanced mathematics, and anyone interested in the properties of ellipses and their circumferences.

deep838
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
I was wondering about how to find the circumference of an ellipse.
I googled for it and found this: http://paulbourke.net/geometry/ellipsecirc/

That got me pretty amazed! I don't know high level maths, but still, can someone please explain to me why the circumference takes such a complicated form?

I mean, why shouldn't it simply be π*(a+b), where a & b are the major and minor axis.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
http://www.mathsisfun.com/geometry/ellipse-perimeter.html
The best way to understand why the ellipse is so difficult to work out a formula for, try figuring out one for yourself.
Apart from that it is difficult to figure what sort of answer you are expecting: it is the property of an ellipse to be like that just like it is the property of a circle to have an irrational ratio of circumference to diameter.
 
deep838 said:
I was wondering about how to find the circumference of an ellipse.
I googled for it and found this: http://paulbourke.net/geometry/ellipsecirc/

That got me pretty amazed! I don't know high level maths, but still, can someone please explain to me why the circumference takes such a complicated form?

I mean, why shouldn't it simply be π*(a+b), where a & b are the major and minor axis.
What you are really asking is "why isn't everything trivial?". To which the only reasonable answer is "why should it be?"
 
To get some intuition regarding why the circumference is not simply ##\pi(a+b)##, consider a highly eccentric ellipse, say with ##b >> a##. The circumference should not be very different from ##4b##, because the ellipse consists of two arcs from ##(0,b)## to ##(0,-b)## (assuming appropriately chosen coordinates) which are nearly straight line segments, each of length ##2b##. Thus the circumference should be close to ##4b##, whereas your proposed formula gives ##\pi(a+b) \approx \pi b##.

Therefore, for ##b >> a##, the ##\pi(a+b)## formula would need to be multiplied by a correction factor of approximately ##4/\pi \approx 1.27##.

Compare this with the "better" approximation given here, for example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ellipse#Area

$$\pi(a+b) \left(1 + \frac{3\left(\frac{a-b}{a+b}\right)^2}{10 + \sqrt{4 - 3\left(\frac{a-b}{a+b}\right)^2}}\right)$$
We may view the expression in the large parentheses as a correction factor applied to ##\pi(a+b)##. If ##b>>a## we may approximate ##a \approx 0## in that expression, and the result is
$$1 + \frac{3}{10 + \sqrt{4 - 3}} = 1 + \frac{3}{11} \approx 1.27$$
 
hmm... thanks to all of you... especially jbuniii ! i can now see what i wasn't seeing before! and forgive me if I'm asking too much, but can any of you provide me a link to where this/these expressions are derived?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
22K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K