The definition of the density operator in Pathria

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the definition of the density operator as presented in Pathria's statistical mechanics book. Participants explore the meaning and implications of the density operator, particularly the term involving expansion coefficients.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the meaning of the density operator definition, specifically the term a(t)^{k}_m a(t)^{k*}_n.
  • Another participant explains that the density matrix is defined for a finite ensemble of isolated systems and describes how the wave function of each system can be expressed as a linear combination of basis functions.
  • The explanation includes details about the average value of a quantity over the ensemble and how it relates to the density matrix.
  • The density matrix is introduced as a quantity that appears in the calculation of averages, with a specific formulation provided.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants appear to agree on the technical aspects of the density operator and its formulation, but there is no explicit consensus on the initial participant's understanding of the definition.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the completeness of the basis functions and the nature of the systems being considered, which may not be universally applicable.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in statistical mechanics, quantum mechanics, and the mathematical formulation of density operators may find this discussion beneficial.

silverwhale
Messages
78
Reaction score
2
Hello Everybody,

I am working through Pathria's statistical mechanics book; on page 114 I found the following definition for the density operator:
[tex]\rho_{mn}= \frac{1}{N} \sum_{k=1}^{N}\left \{ a(t)^{k}_m a(t)^{k*}_n \right \},[/tex]
where N is the number of systems in the ensemble and the a(t)'s are expansion coefficents.
Now my question is: what does this definition mean? Especially the term [tex]a(t)^{k}_m a(t)^{k*}_n.[/tex] I do not get it.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The formula you wrote above refers to the definition of density matrix for a finite ensemble of isolated systems (beware, not for a subsystem in interaction with environment). It works as follows.


Imagine that there is an ensemble of N copies of the system. Denote the wave function describing the k-th system by

[tex] \psi^{k}(\mathbf r).[/tex]

(Different copies have different wave functions).


It is assumed that this function can be expressed as a discrete linear combination of some basis functions [itex]\Phi_m[/itex], which are the same for all k:


[tex] \psi^{k}(\mathbf r) = \sum_k a_m^k \Phi_m(\mathbf r).[/tex]

The numbers [itex]a^k[/itex] are complex expansion coefficients.

(Such expansion is possible if the set of functions [itex]\Phi_m[/itex] is complete, like for Hamiltonian eigenfunctions of harmonic oscillator. In case of hydrogen eigenfunctions, things are more complicated, due to continuous spectrum of Hamiltonian).

The density matrix is introduced usually as a quantity [itex]\rho_{mn}[/itex] that appears in the calculation of average value of some quantity [itex]f[/itex], say energy, over the ensemble.

The average over the ensemble is the weighted sum

[tex] <br /> \langle \langle f \rangle \rangle = \sum_k p_k \langle f \rangle^k,<br /> [/tex]

where [itex]p_k = 1/N[/itex] is the probability that the system is in state described by k-th wave function.

The expression

[tex] <br /> \langle f \rangle^k[/tex]

used above is the average of [itex]f[/itex] in a state described by [itex]\psi^k[/itex] function and can be expressed as

[tex] \langle \psi^k | \hat f | \psi^k \rangle = \sum_{m,n} a_m^{k} a_n^{k*} f_{nm}. [/tex]

where [itex]f_{nm} = \langle \Phi_n|\hat f|\Phi_m\rangle[/itex].

Then, the average over the ensemble is

[tex] <br /> \langle \langle f \rangle\rangle = \sum_k \frac{1}{N} \sum_{m,n} a_m^{k} a_n^{k*} f_{nm}. [/tex]


This can be rewritten as

[tex] <br /> \sum_m \left( \rho_{mn}f_{nm} \right)<br /> [/tex]

where the quantity

[tex] \rho_{mn} = \sum_k \frac{1}{N} a_m^{k} a_n^{k*} [/tex]

was named the density matrix.
 
Perfect.

Many many thanks!
If you were living in Hamburg, Germany, I would give you a bag full of cookies!
I am really thankful! :)
 
Glad to be of help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K