The destructive force of a 1,000kg boulder hurled by a catapult

  • Thread starter Thread starter Journeyman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the impact of a 1,000 kg boulder when launched at troops using medieval siege weapons like trebuchets. While typical boulders used in siege warfare weigh between 80 kg and 120 kg, larger projectiles can be effective but may not significantly increase destructive capability. A boulder of this size would primarily crush those directly beneath it upon impact, with potential for serious injury or death from bouncing or tumbling. The terrain affects the outcome; for instance, a boulder landing in soft ground may behave differently than one on solid ground. However, the impact would not generate a significant concussive blast unless the boulder were traveling at much higher velocities, which is beyond the capability of traditional siege engines. Videos and real-life examples illustrate the destructive potential of falling boulders, emphasizing that the type of rock and its velocity are crucial factors in determining the extent of damage.
Journeyman
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement: Could be silly to some, but I am writing a short story and hope someone can help.
Relevant Equations: I am clueless, forgive me.

Hello all! I tried asking Bing/CoPilot, Google, and visited some medieval war machine forums, but could not find something that could help me with my question. I am in the midst of writing a short story and being a big fan of the Dark Millennium of Warhammer 40,000 books, I understand the rather effective fiction and dramatic effect of having things being much bigger than they usually are when it comes to destructive force and overwhelming annihilation.

I understand that trebuchets with their heavy counterweights can hurl massive boulders to siege castles. I have read that though the average weight of a rock boulder hurled is usually around 80kg to 120kg, and they were highly effective in siege warfare, and going any heavier than that is highly inefficient and overkill. I have read that they can toss 250kg, 500kg, and even up to a tonne.

However, I would like to be able to visualise just what would happen if a 1,000kg (1 tonne) rock boulder is tossed into a unit of troops. What would happen based on the laws of physics, joules, force, etc. I tried one of the online formula calculators but I totally have no idea how to use them. I understand my question could be vague, and do not have any parameters such as speed, velocity, angle, etc. to supply you, but I guess a general idea of what would happen to the mass of troops would do. For example, would the rock just land into the ground and flatten whatever is under it? Or would there be a massive impact so destructive that it would create a crater and a mini explosive and concussive force that hurls men about and break bones?

Forgive me as I am an arts student and do not have a shred of understanding of physics. Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the size of rocks you're talking about, an 'impact' would mostly just crush those it directly impacted. Some would be hit as the boulder bounced and tumbled into them, seriously injuring or killing them, and that's about all. It might scatter some mud or dirt around from impacting with the ground, but those effects depend on exactly what the terrain is like. A boulder landing in a bog is somewhat different than a boulder landing in a grassy field, but mostly in whether or not it bounces and rolls. Regardless of terrain there wouldn't much if any concussive 'blast', as there just isn't enough energy being imparted into the air.

To get seriously different results the boulder would need to be travelling at MUCH higher velocities than a simple catapult or trebuchet can produce. And if you have the technology to launch a 1-ton boulder at mach velocities you probably have better weapons like artillery and missiles.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters, Astronuc, erobz and 1 other person
Like this cow.
 
Journeyman said:
However, I would like to be able to visualise just what would happen if a 1,000kg (1 tonne) rock boulder is tossed into a unit of troops. What would happen based on the laws of physics, joules, force, etc.
One can find videos of boulder(s) rolling down hill, some going airborne, and smashing structures. Depending on the type of rock, the rock may break apart into smaller projectiles. The type of damage depends on the mass and velocity.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/5dbj85/landslides-kills-9-tourists-in-terrifying-video-india

When a boulder crashes into a home
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...er-crashes-honolulu-home-nearly-str-rcna68351

Boulder rolled down a hill breaks a tree (don't do this)


One can find examples of houses in Canterbury, NZ, where boulders were loosened on hillsides and crashed into houses.
 
We've just had an interesting thread about generation ships, but I don't think that that is the most reasonable way to colonize another planet. Fatal problems: - Crew may become chaotic and self destructive. - Crew may become so adapted to space as to be unwilling to return to a planet. - Making the planet habitable may take longer then the trip, so the ship needs to last far longer than just the journey. - Mid-flight malfunction may render the ship unable to decelerate at the destination...
I know this topic is extremely contraversial and debated, but I'm writing a book where an AI attempts to become as human as possible. Would it, eventually, especially in the far future, be possible for an AI to gain a conscious? To be clear, my definition of a consciousness being the ability to possess self-created morals, thoughts, and views, AKA a whole personality. And if this is possible (and let's just say it is for this question), about how long may it take for something to happen...
This is a question for people who know about astrophysics. It's been said that the habitable zones around red dwarf stars are so close to those stars that any planets in the zones would be tidally locked to the stars in question. With one side roasting and another side freezing almost forever, those planets wouldn't be hospitable to life. a) Could there be forms of life--whole ecologies--that first evolve in the planet's twilight zone and then extend their habitat by burrowing...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
49
Views
4K
Back
Top