The dimension of the span of three linearly independent R^3 vectors

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The dimension of the span of the vectors x1 = (2, 1, 3), x2 = (3, -1, 4), and x3 = (2, 6, 4) in R3 is 2. This conclusion is reached by calculating the determinant of the matrix formed by these vectors, which results in a determinant of 0, indicating linear dependence. Consequently, at least one vector can be expressed as a linear combination of the others, confirming that the span does not cover the entire R3 space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces and their dimensions
  • Knowledge of linear independence and dependence
  • Ability to compute determinants of matrices
  • Familiarity with linear combinations of vectors
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about row reduction techniques to determine linear independence
  • Study the properties of determinants in relation to vector spaces
  • Explore the concept of basis and dimension in vector spaces
  • Investigate scalar multiplication and its implications in linear algebra
USEFUL FOR

Students studying linear algebra, educators teaching vector space concepts, and anyone seeking to understand the implications of linear dependence in R3.

amolv06
Messages
45
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given

x_{1}= \begin{pmatrix} 2 \\ 1 \\ 3 \end{pmatrix}, x_{2}= \begin{pmatrix} 3 \\ -1 \\ 4 \end{pmatrix}, x_{3}= \begin{pmatrix} 2 \\ 6 \\ 4 \end{pmatrix}

Find the dimension of Span(x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3})



Homework Equations



If V is a vector space of dimension n > 0 then any set of n linearly independent vectors spans V.

If the x vectors are combined into a matrix and the matrix is nonsingular then the vectors are linearly independent.

dim R^{3} = 3



The Attempt at a Solution



det \begin{vmatrix} 2 & 3 & 2 \\ 1 & -1 & 6 \\ 3 & 4 & 4 \end{vmatrix} = -28.

This shows that the three vectors are linearly independent. This should mean that any vector in R^{3} should be able to be represented as a linear combination of the three given vectors. Therefore, shouldn't Span(x_{1}, x_{2}, x{3}) have a dimension of 3? The answers section in the back of my book says it has 2 dimensions. I can't quite figure out why.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Heh, I'm being silly. I miscalculated the determinant. It should be 0. Looks like we can represent anyone of the vectors with any of the other 2.
 
amolv06 said:

Homework Statement



Given

x_{1}= \begin{pmatrix} 2 \\ 1 \\ 3 \end{pmatrix}, x_{2}= \begin{pmatrix} 3 \\ -1 \\ 4 \end{pmatrix}, x_{3}= \begin{pmatrix} 2 \\ 6 \\ 4 \end{pmatrix}

Find the dimension of Span(x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3})







Homework Equations



If V is a vector space of dimension n > 0 then any set of n linearly independent vectors spans V.

If the x vectors are combined into a matrix and the matrix is nonsingular then the vectors are linearly independent.

dim R^{3} = 3



The Attempt at a Solution



det \begin{vmatrix} 2 & 3 & 2 \\ 1 & -1 & 6 \\ 3 & 4 & 4 \end{vmatrix} = -28.

This shows that the three vectors are linearly independent. This should mean that any vector in R^{3} should be able to be represented as a linear combination of the three given vectors. Therefore, shouldn't Span(x_{1}, x_{2}, x{3}) have a dimension of 3? The answers section in the back of my book says it has 2 dimensions. I can't quite figure out why.



what's wrong is that your calc is wrong----> det=0 in this case,

do it another time, pay attection to the signs.

regards
marco
 
Be careful. Knowing that the determinant is 0 only tells you that the dimension of the span is less than 3. Either one of the vectors can be written as a combination of the other two (and so the span has dimension 2) or two can be written as multiples of the other one (in which case the span would have dimension 1). I would use row reduction rather than finding the determinant to distinguish those possibilities.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Be careful. Knowing that the determinant is 0 only tells you that the dimension of the span is less than 3. Either one of the vectors can be written as a combination of the other two (and so the span has dimension 2) or two can be written as multiples of the other one (in which case the span would have dimension 1). I would use row reduction rather than finding the determinant to distinguish those possibilities.

Yes you are right, in general is like you say; but with three vector if the determinant is zero you can be sure that two are independent just looking at the numbers, i.e. choose two that are not multiple of each others. In this case is easy.

ciao
marco
 
HallsofIvy said:
Either one of the vectors can be written as a combination of the other two (and so the span has dimension 2)

I'm actually working a problem similar to this, could you please explain this more? Does writing something as a combination involves multiplying the first vector by a scalar to get the second vector? So if I can multiply a vector by a scalar and get the other two then the dimension is 2?

I'm pretty lost.
 
With a 3 x 3 matrix whose determinant is zero, the set of three vectors is linearly dependent. This means that one of the following must be true:
  1. One vector is a scalar multiple of another vector, such that there are two vectors that are linearly independent.
  2. One vector is a linear combination of the other two, such that there are two vectors that are linearly independent.
  3. Two vectors are (possibly different) scalar multiples of the third.
  4. All three vectors are zero vectors.
The dimensions of the span{v1, v2, v3} in these situations would be, respectively:
2
2
1
0
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K