I The dramatic difference between wet and dry sphere splashes

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Russ Edmonds
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference Sphere
Russ Edmonds
Messages
16
Reaction score
14
TL;DR Summary
This phenomenon was first observed by A. M. Worthington in 1897.
Caution: This video has music. Turn sound off before watching if this bothers you!

 
Reply
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes Ibix, anorlunda, Twigg and 1 other person
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'

Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'

Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
View full post »

Thread 'Do electron density waves accompany EM waves in coaxial cables?'

Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
View full post »
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'

Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'

The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Energy Efficient Boiling of Eggs
Replies
9
Views
1K
I Gravity at Earth's poles vs equator
Replies
12
Views
2K
I Does dividing maximum frequency by sound frequency give accurate velocity?
Replies
17
Views
2K
Is It Safe to Inject a COVID Booster Before the Alcohol Prep Pad Dries?
Replies
18
Views
3K
I Help Needed with Tracker Physics Program Measuring Acceleration
Replies
10
Views
2K
Is this possible for hanging objects from spinning sphere?
Replies
5
Views
2K
Doublet flow in Fluid Dynamics between two spheres or cylinders
Replies
0
Views
1K
I Angular momentum and turning a bicycle
Replies
17
Views
4K
Restoring Dry Desert Rivers Into Green Oasis Flowing With Water
Replies
6
Views
2K
B Hopf fibration, Bloch sphere and quantum rotations - interactive site
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top