Is this possible for hanging objects from spinning sphere?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hellohello
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sphere Spinning
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the theoretical possibility of objects hanging from a spinning sphere, as depicted in a video clip. Participants explore the mechanics of how these objects could behave under the influence of rotation and gravity, considering both theoretical and practical implications.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant argues that it is theoretically impossible for objects to hang straight out from the surface of a spinning sphere without external forces, suggesting that the strings would always be perpendicular to the ground.
  • Another participant proposes that fixed beams could be used instead of strings to achieve a position above the topmost part of the sphere.
  • A different viewpoint asserts that if the tethers are not rigid, the highest position for any object would be with its tether parallel to the ground.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the reality of the video, questioning the feasibility of the depicted scenario.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the feasibility of the scenario, with some supporting the idea that it could be possible under certain conditions, while others maintain that it is not achievable without rigid tethers and mechanical control.

Contextual Notes

Assumptions about the nature of the tethers (rigid vs. flexible) and the effects of gravity and rotation are central to the discussion, but these assumptions remain unresolved.

hellohello
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
This youtube clip has a ride that is a spinning sphere with objects hanging by strings from the surface.

(see at about 0:55)

This is the only ride in the video I think is theoretically impossible (the others seem like they could be done but would be dangerous and/or costly). I think it's theoretically impossible because there is no way objects on the top hemisphere could stick straight up, with their strings perpendicular to the surface of the sphere, without some external force like wind blowing from the ground up. If you deconstruct the sphere, which is only spinning along the z-axis in the theta direction, it is like many thin rings stacked on top of each other. If you take anyone of those rings with an object hanging from it and spin the ring (only in the theta direction), the highest up off the ground it could be is (just short of) the height of ring from the ground, with only natural forces acting on it.

My friend thinks that these objects could be sticking out with the strings perpendicular to the surface of the sphere no matter where they are on the sphere, except at the very top, if the sphere is spinning fast enough.

I think that even if the strings were infinitely strong and the sphere were spinning infinitely fast, the strings that the objects were hanging from would be perpendicular to the ground (not the surface of the sphere).

Am I right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hellohello said:
Am I right?
Yes, everything is correct.

You could use fixed beams instead of strings for the upper sections to get seat positions above the topmost part of the sphere.
 
You realize that nothing in that video is real right?
 
You are correct. Your friend is wrong.

If those tethers are not rigid, the highest that any particular pod could go is with its tether parallel to the ground.

The only way the idea could be realized is to make the tethers rigid AND to mechanically control the angle at which they emerge from the sphere.
 
mrspeedybob said:
You realize that nothing in that video is real right?
It's still hilarious: Gravity is an error.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
A.T. said:
It's still hilarious:

I agree.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
541
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K