The Earth as its own nuclear magnetic resonance machine

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of using the Earth's magnetic field for nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) imaging. Participants debate the signal-to-noise ratio, particularly the impact of thermodynamic noise and the non-homogeneity of the Earth's magnetic field on NMR and EPR effectiveness. Key points include the necessity for a steady homogeneous magnetic field and high Q factors in resonant cavities for successful resonance detection. The conversation also touches on the potential use of superconducting materials to enhance Q factors and the manipulation of the magnetic field in laboratory settings.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) principles and applications
  • Familiarity with electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) techniques
  • Knowledge of magnetic field homogeneity and its effects on resonance
  • Basic principles of signal-to-noise ratio in electromagnetic systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of NMR and EPR in varying magnetic field conditions
  • Explore the design and optimization of high Q resonant cavities for EPR
  • Investigate the effects of thermodynamic noise on NMR signal detection
  • Study the use of superconductors in enhancing resonance detection capabilities
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in magnetic resonance technologies, and engineers involved in electromagnetic systems who are interested in advanced imaging techniques and their practical limitations.

beatfrequency
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
My physics buddy and I have been having a debate. I was claiming that even under the natural Earth's magnetic field that with good signal to noise ratio based on the radar systems scaled appropriately the top layers of the Earth could be seen. He claimed that the signal to noise ratio of the T1 and T2 echo reply would be too low. Is thermodynamic noise too great for this task even with adaptive noise cancelling technologies? We were studying the Na2+ ion for Earth Gauss levels of magnetic field and the NMR and ion cyclotron resonance frequencies and intensities.

Has anyone run the equations and what do you think? Is it possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In a related note can it also be done with electron para-magnetic spin resonance imagining even on static electricity at Earth Gauss levels?
 
I think your proposal is overly ambitious. For NMR and EPR to work you have to have a steady homogeneous B field over the resonant sample (or at least know how the B field varies over space). Take out your gaussmeter and walk around the lab and you will see that the Earth's magnetic field is not very homogeneous. Also, say you wanted to do NMR on a mountain. You would have to wrap a pickup coil around the mountain (with miles of wire) and attempt to detect a very small NMR signal at rf frequencies. This huge coil would have a very small Q factor. The only data you would get would be lighting crashes and the a.m. band talk shows. In EPR, the sample is placed in a high Q microwave resonant cavity and exposed to microwaves coupled to the cavity resonant modes. The sample is placed between the poles of a magnet and the intensity of the B field is varied until the sample absorbs the microwave energy and causes the resonance peak of the cavity to collapse. You need a high Q resonant cavity, a steady homogeneous magnetic field, and electromagnetic radiation at the appropriate frequency to do magnetic resonance.
 
Could you use the ionosophere and Earth as the cavity? Let's say the B field is known precisely everywhere. I thought that at Earth Gauss levels (.5) that paramagnetic electron resonance is roughly 1.4 Mhz. NMR resonances would fall under 1000 Hertz (ELF) with simple ions. What if the coil was made of super conductor for a high Q?
 
Also I thought I read somewhere that manipulation of the B field is preferable in the lab but it is not necessary to create the effect. The B field can remain constant and the resonator altered. I maybe confused.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
957
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
18K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
14K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K