The effect of instrumental broadening on FWHM in Raman peaks

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effect of instrumental broadening on the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of Raman peaks in spectroscopy. Participants explore how factors such as the solid angle of objectives, slit width, and spectrometer length influence the measurement of Raman line width and the accuracy of these measurements.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the relationship between instrumental broadening and parameters like slit width and spectrometer length, suggesting that these factors affect the accuracy of FWHM measurements.
  • One participant presents a formula for calculating instrumental broadening, stating that it can be approximated as Δλ ≈ (d * b) / f, where d is the grating spacing, b is the slit width, and f is the focal length of the optics.
  • Another participant questions how to determine the values of parameters such as N (number of lines on the grating) and m (order of diffraction) in the context of their specific setup.
  • Participants discuss the trade-off between resolution and signal throughput when narrowing slit widths to minimize instrumental broadening.
  • There is a mention of the importance of focusing the beam optimally onto the entrance slit to improve the illuminated width of the diffraction grating.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the implications of their calculated instrumental broadening on the accuracy of their FWHM measurements.
  • Another participant notes that if the instrumental broadening is significantly smaller than the FWHM, it may be considered negligible.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and uncertainty regarding the parameters involved in calculating instrumental broadening. There is no consensus on the specific values or implications of these parameters for accurate FWHM measurement, indicating that multiple competing views remain.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the dependence of their calculations on specific definitions and setups, such as the type of spectrometer used and the adjustments made to slit widths. There are unresolved questions about the general values of parameters like d and f, as well as the specific impact of instrumental broadening on measurement accuracy.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for researchers and practitioners in spectroscopy, particularly those working with Raman spectroscopy and interested in understanding the effects of instrumental parameters on measurement accuracy.

  • #31
Thank you very much Charles.

Looking forward to discuss with you more. Have a great day !

Best Regards,
Avra
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
Science news on Phys.org
  • #32
Hi Charles:

Hope you are doing well. I would like to know whether the absorbance efficiency of 532 nm laser used in Raman spectroscopy is independent of temperature. If it is dependent on temperature, then how ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K