The effect of slightly slanted distance (arm) on torque output

  • Thread starter Thread starter karabiner98k
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arm Output Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the impact of a slight angle between a torque wrench and its extension on torque output. It highlights that while the angle between the force and the lever arm is critical, the angle created by the extension's alignment can also affect calculations. The effective lever arm can be determined using cosine adjustments for small angles, with a specific example showing that a 3-degree angle has minimal effect on torque output. The calculations confirm that the actual lever arm remains close to the expected length, leading to a torque output of approximately 158 N-m when applying 18 kg of force. Ultimately, measuring the distance from the extension's square drive to the wrench drive center may be a simpler approach.
karabiner98k
Messages
90
Reaction score
12
Hi everyone.
In most cases when torque and lever arm are being discussed, it is the angle between the force and the arm that matters (like in the following picture).

maxresdefault.jpg
However, non of the articles that I have read so far have mentioned anything about the distance between force and fastener being straight or not.
I have made an extension for my torque wrench (effective length = 0.4 meter) but due to ratchet gears of the wrench, I can't attach it to the extension in a way that both form a straight line. There is a small angle between the extension and the wrench as can be seen in the following picture specified with a blue arrow:

20220319_210633.jpg

20220319_210855.jpg
If the angle is between the force and the lever, we use sin(θ) to calculate torque but what about this angle? How does it affect the final torque output? What if the distance from the fastener is not straight? How do you calculate torque in this special case (Assuming (θ) = 3 degrees) ?

Force = 18 kg (176.5 N)
(θ) = 3 degrees
Total length = 0.895 meter
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
The actual lever arm is the distance between the fastener and the force, being that distance always perfectly perpendicular to the line of application of the force.

In this particular case, the point and direction of application of the hand force is not too precise.
Also consider that the fastener will be "feeling" a greater torque than the set torque value of the wrench.
Please, see:
https://firetrucksandequipment.tpub.com/TM-9-254/css/TM-9-254_92.htm

https://www.engineersedge.com/manufacturing_spec/torque_wrench_1.htm

Torque wrench.jpg


TM-9-254_92_1.jpg


torque5.gif
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes karabiner98k and hutchphd
Also consider that the fastener will be "feeling" a greater torque than the set torque value of the wrench.
Thanks for your answer. Yes, I'm completely aware of the increased torque due to increased length and this has also been mentioned in the wrench manual with the following formula:

IMG-20220320-WA0000.jpg


In fact, I made the extension to both increase the range of my wrench and to operate it with less force. For instance, to apply 210 nm with the wrench (without extension), I have to apply 53 kg to its handle which is more than my body weight! With the extension attached, I can apply the same torque by setting the wrench at 94 nm which requires 24 kg to its handle.

Is that yellow line you drew is my actual lever arm? Should I ignore the sine and cosine of that small (blue) angle in my calculations?
According to my measurements, the yellow line you drew is about 0.895 meter.

Therefore, if I apply 18 kg to wrench handle with the extension, will I get 158 nm?
 
Last edited:
karabiner98k said:
Thanks for your answer.
...
Is that yellow line you drew is my actual level arm? Should I ignore the sine and cosine of that small (blue) angle in my calculations?
According to my measurements, the yellow line you drew is about 0.895 meter.

Therefore, if I apply 18 kg to wrench handle with the extension, will I get 158 nm?
You are welcome. :smile:
Yes, that yellow line represents your actual lever arm.
If you move that line down to align it with the torque wrench, you will see that the 0.4 m of the wrench remain the same, and that the actual 0.495 m length of the extension becomes 0.495 x cos (angle) for your purpose.

If the angle is estimated to be 3 degrees, then your effective or actual lever arm is 0.4 + (0.495 x cos (3)) = 0.4 + 0.494 = 0.894 m.
Torque on fastener for 18 kgf hand-applied = 18 x 9.81 x 0.894 = 157.91 N-m
 
  • Like
Likes karabiner98k
If the angle is estimated to be 3 degrees, then your effective or actual lever arm is 0.4 + (0.495 x cos (3)) = 0.4 + 0.494 = 0.894 m.
Thanks a million! This is exactly what I wanted to know! So, that angle doesn't make a huge difference in the final torque output. I think the other and simpler alternative would be to just measuring the length from extension square drive to wrench drive (center to center) instead of measuring the angle precisely.
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top