The eigenvalues and eigenvectors of T

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 2K views
Schwarzschild90
Messages
111
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The eigenvectors and eigenvalues of T.PNG


Homework Equations


The lattice laplacian is defined as [itex]\Delta^2 = \frac{T}{\tau}[/itex], where T is the transition matrix [tex] \left[ \begin{array}{cccc}<br /> -2 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\<br /> 1 & -2 & 1 & 0 \\<br /> 0 & 1 & -2 & 1 \\<br /> 0 & 0 & 1 & -2 \end{array} \right][/tex]

and [tex]\tau[/tex] is a time constant, which is taken = 1.

The Attempt at a Solution


The eigenvectors and eigenvalues of T solution.PNG
 
Physics news on Phys.org
remember that the eigenvector is a vector ##v=[O_{1}(j),O_{2}(j),O_{3}(j),O_{4}(j)]## (for the case ##4\times 4##), ##\tau=1##, so is ##v\Delta^{2}=\lambda v## ...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Schwarzschild90
Ssnow said:
remember that the eigenvector is a vector ##v=[O_{1}(j),O_{2}(j),O_{3}(j),O_{4}(j)]## (for the case ##4\times 4##), ##\tau=1##, so is ##v\Delta^{2}=\lambda v## ...
Right.

How is the lattice Laplacian commonly defined?
 
Last edited:
Sincerely I searched on the web and I have found only this

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discrete_Laplace_operator

this is the discrete Laplace operator and yours...

Regarding your problem (in the example that you proposed) is the same to verify the system:
##[O_{1}(j),O_{2}(j),O_{3}(j),O_{4}(j)]\left[\begin{array}{cccc}-2 & 1 & 0&0 \\ 1&-2&1&0\\0&1&-2&1\\0&0&1&-2 \end{array}\right]=[\lambda O_{1}(j),\lambda O_{2}(j),\lambda O_{3}(j),\lambda O_{4}(j)]##

that is

##-2O_{1}+O_{2}=\lambda O_{1}, O_{1}-2O_{2}+O_{3}=\lambda O_{2}, ... ## and so on ...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Schwarzschild90
Ssnow said:
Sincerely I searched on the web and I have found only this

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discrete_Laplace_operator

this is the discrete Laplace operator and yours...

Regarding your problem (in the example that you proposed) is the same to verify the system:
##[O_{1}(j),O_{2}(j),O_{3}(j),O_{4}(j)]\left[\begin{array}{cccc}-2 & 1 & 0&0 \\ 1&-2&1&0\\0&1&-2&1\\0&0&1&-2 \end{array}\right]=[\lambda O_{1}(j),\lambda O_{2}(j),\lambda O_{3}(j),\lambda O_{4}(j)]##

that is

##-2O_{1}+O_{2}=\lambda O_{1}, O_{1}-2O_{2}+O_{3}=\lambda O_{2}, ... ## and so on ...
Okay, I knew that definition of the lattice Laplacian. It's what we used in the course, but it was not defined as such.

Right.

Next step is solving the characteristic equation for the eigenvalues of the system.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ssnow
Hi, this seems a serious article,

http://math.ucdenver.edu/~brysmith/software/Eigenvalues_of_the_discrete_laplacian_bryan_smith.pdf

I think can help you!

Ssnow
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Schwarzschild90
Ssnow said:
Hi, this seems a serious article,

http://math.ucdenver.edu/~brysmith/software/Eigenvalues_of_the_discrete_laplacian_bryan_smith.pdf

I think can help you!

Ssnow
I read it through, but we haven't worked that much in-depth with eigenvalues and eigenvectors with respect to the lattice Lalplacian or used applied linear algebra sufficiently for me to easily understand that. So it's slightly above my mathematical skills, but I'll talk it through with my professor tomorrow and see what I come up with.

But from what I could garner, the eigenvalues are given simply by two formulas, one for the even-valued k and one for odd-valued k.
 
Last edited: