The Euler Equation and Incompressible Fluid Theorems

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Euler equation for incompressible fluids and theorems related to fluid dynamics, particularly focusing on the application of the divergence theorem and the implications of incompressibility in fluid flow.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the rewriting of the Euler equation using suffix notation and discuss theorems applicable to the problem, including the divergence theorem. There are attempts to manipulate the equations and integrate terms, raising questions about the validity of certain steps and the implications of incompressibility.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the application of the divergence theorem and the implications of the incompressibility condition. There is an ongoing exploration of the correctness of the mathematical manipulations and assumptions made throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of the potential force in the problem statement and question the assumptions regarding constants and terms in the equations. The discussion reflects a learning process with varying levels of confidence in the interpretations of the equations involved.

aclaret
Messages
24
Reaction score
9
Homework Statement
Let ##u: R^3 \times R \rightarrow R^3## be flow velocity of incompressible fluid. Let fluid be subject to potential force ##-\nabla \chi##. To prove
$$\frac{d}{dt} \int_{V} \frac{1}{2} \rho \langle u, u \rangle dV + \int_{\partial V} H \langle u, n \rangle dA = 0$$where ##H := \frac{1}{2}\rho \langle u, u \rangle + p + \chi##, and notation ##\langle x, y \rangle## denote standard inner product on ##R^3##.
Relevant Equations
fluid dynamic, euler's equation of the motion
$$\frac{Du}{Dt} = -\frac{\nabla p}{\rho} - \nabla \chi$$I re-write the Euler equation for incompressible fluid using suffix notation
$$\frac{\partial u_i}{\partial t} + u_j \frac{\partial u_i}{\partial x_j} + \frac{\partial}{\partial x_i} \left(\frac{p}{\rho} + \chi \right) = 0$$what theorems applies to the problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have integrals involving a volume and a surface. That would suggest the divergence theorem.
 
divergence theorem I can write$$\int_{\partial V} \langle u, n \rangle dA = \int_V \frac{\partial u_j}{\partial x_j} dV$$try multiply equation by ##u_i## and then do implicit summation also over ##i##

$$u_i \frac{\partial u_i}{\partial t} + u_i u_j \frac{\partial u_i}{\partial x_j} + u_i \frac{\partial}{\partial x_i} \left(\frac{p}{\rho} + \chi \right) = 0$$get for second term$$u_i u_j \frac{\partial u_i}{\partial x_j} = \frac{1}{2}u_j \frac{\partial}{\partial x_j} \langle u, u \rangle$$first term also

$$u_i \frac{\partial u_i}{\partial t} = \frac{1}{2} \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \langle u,u \rangle$$do I effect the volume integral to both sides?

$$\int_V \frac{1}{2} \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \langle u,u \rangle dV + \int_V \frac{1}{2}u_j \frac{\partial}{\partial x_j} \langle u, u \rangle dV + \int_V u_i \frac{\partial}{\partial x_i} \left(\frac{p}{\rho} + \chi \right) dV = 0$$can I make use of divergence theorem here?
 
$$\frac{d}{dt} \int_V \frac{1}{2} \rho \langle u,u \rangle dV + \int_V u_i \frac{\partial}{\partial x_i} \left[ \frac{1}{2} \rho \langle u, u \rangle + \left(p + \rho \chi \right) \right] dV = K, \quad K \, \mathrm{= constant}$$I can try integrate second term by parts,$$\int_V u_i \frac{\partial}{\partial x_i} \left[ \frac{1}{2} \rho \langle u, u \rangle + \left(p + \rho \chi \right) \right] dV = \int_{\partial V} \left[ \frac{1}{2} \rho \langle u, u \rangle + \left(p + \rho \chi \right) \right] \langle u, n \rangle dA - \int_{V} \left[ \frac{1}{2} \rho \langle u, u \rangle + \left(p + \rho \chi \right) \right] \frac{\partial u_i}{\partial x_i} dV$$does second term vanish? even if, the first term still incorrect. I wonder if you can tell second hint @pasmith :), I'm in a little confusion ;)
 
What is the divergence of an incompressible fluid?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: aclaret
let me see... clearly from equation of continuity it follow that if ##(\forall x,t) \, \rho(x,t) = \text{constant}##, then ##\nabla \cdot u = 0##. hence, second integral vanish, and get$$\frac{d}{dt} \int_V \frac{1}{2} \rho \langle u,u \rangle dV + \int_{\partial V} \left[ \frac{1}{2} \rho \langle u, u \rangle + \left(p + \rho \chi \right) \right] \langle u, n \rangle dA = K, \quad K \, \mathrm{= constant}$$but this would give me ##H := \frac{1}{2} \rho \langle u, u \rangle + p + \rho \chi##, which tiny bit different to problem statement. would you agree my work is correct, or did I do a mistake somewhere...
 
The problem statement says that the fluid is subject ot a potential force of -\nabla\chi, not -\rho\nabla\chi. Other than that your work is correct.

The constant K is zero; it were not there would be some point where <br /> \rho \frac{Du}{Dt} + \nabla p + \nabla \chi \neq 0.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: aclaret
parfait! yes I see, thank for point out my mistake with the factor of ##\rho##. I also was not certain how to "convince myself" that ##K## indeed vanish.

i think necessary for me do lot more of these problem to learn the tricks of the trade :), the simple realize that ##\nabla \cdot u = 0## was enough here to reveal how to finish the solution!

thank for your assistance :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K