Going from the abstract state vector lψ> and the mean-value of an observable x (operator) given by:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

<x> = <ψlxlψ>

I want to show how that is done in the position basis:

So I take:

<x> = <ψlxlψ>

And insert completeness in front of the state vector to get the expansion involving the wave function:

1 = ∫lx><xl (1)

But when my teacher did this he insisted on using lx'> and furthermore that you actually inserted two different operators ∫lx'><x'l and ∫lx''><x''l

both of course represent the unit operator. But I am curious as to why you need to make this primes. Why isnt (1) sufficient? Where does confusion arise and why do you need two "different" unit operators?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# The expectation value in quantum theory

Loading...

Similar Threads - expectation value quantum | Date |
---|---|

I Which ψ do I use for the Expectation Value ? | Feb 27, 2017 |

I Can the expectation of an operator be imaginary? | Nov 22, 2016 |

I Free Particle: Time dependence of expectation values Paradox | Jun 14, 2016 |

I Expectation value of momentum for free particle | Jun 14, 2016 |

Harmonic oscillator positive position expectation value?! | Feb 21, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**