The Force of Wind and the Debate on Heat, Energy, and Mass

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter brandy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    F=ma Wind
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between wind, heat, energy, and mass, exploring concepts from Newton's laws and thermodynamics. Participants debate whether wind has mass, the nature of heat as energy, and the forces involved in air movement, including convection currents.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant argues that according to Newton's second law (F = ma), if something has no mass, it cannot exert a force, leading to questions about whether wind, which is associated with heat, has mass.
  • Another participant points out that air, which comprises wind, has mass, and discusses the movement of air particles in relation to heat and pressure changes.
  • A different viewpoint introduces the concept of momentum, noting that massless particles like photons can exert force, suggesting that not all forces require mass.
  • Some participants emphasize that wind is the movement of air from high to low pressure and clarify that air consists of particles with mass, which contributes to the force of wind.
  • There is a discussion about convection currents and how they relate to the movement of air and the generation of wind.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that air has mass and that wind is the movement of air. However, there is disagreement regarding the relationship between heat, energy, and mass, particularly whether energy can exist without mass and how this relates to the forces involved in wind.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various physical principles and equations, but there are unresolved assumptions about the definitions of heat and energy, as well as the implications of mass in relation to force and momentum.

brandy
Messages
156
Reaction score
0
i'm currently discussing this with a friend.
anyway.

here is the conversation:
he said
It started as "If something doesn't have a mass, it cannot have a force", due to Newton's second law, F = ma (Force = Mass x Acceleration). Logically, if you substitute 0 in for the Mass, you will get a result of 0 Force. My brother then argued that there are things which have no mass but still have a force and the main example we discussed was wind. Does wind have a mass? After a while we got to the fact that wind is just heat. After long debating about "does heat have mass" we got to the fact that heat is just energy. Now we are at "does energy have mass". Apparently there are conflicting arguments all over the place with this. I believe for there to be energy, it must have mass, due to Einstein's formula E = mc^2 (Energy = Mass x Speed of Light^2). As with F = ma, if you substitute 0 in for the Mass, you will get a result of 0 Energy.

My thinking:
my understanding is that hot air rises because it is less dense than air that is colder. which is a change in pressure, which is what causes air particles to move. hence wind. so heat causes wind but that doesn't mean wind is heat. is my understanding screwed?

my understanding of heat is that it is a form of energy and that heat does not have a mass and that there must be a flaw in his logic of wind being heat.

So i said that he is overcomplicating things and that the air particles have a mass.

he said:
Well yes, but the thing moving that air... does it have a mass? Because it is able to move the air, meaning it exerts a force, which Newton's Second Law tells us must mean it has a mass. Although this heat, as I said, energy, so the question is, does energy have mass...?

So he doesn’t actually want to know about wind but the force on wind. i asked him how wind was heat and he couldn’t remember.

so the force that causes wind is the force that causes heat i guess. unless the name of that force is wind. in which case I’m thoroughly confused. I think I need a scientific definition of wind here

so now I'm asking you about your opinion of the force that causes wind being heat and how heat is energy and about the force that causes heat

And also I guess this could be related to convection currents.
 
Science news on Phys.org
F=ma applies...

Wind is merely small air particlees moving into your face/body etc. Air has mass.As for convection and generally air movement, there are tons of threads discussing movement of air. Both from a system opint of view and from a particley pov.
 
brandy said:
If something doesn't have a mass, it cannot have a force...
Net Force is also equal to the rate of change of momentum:

\mathbf{F} = \frac{d \mathbf{p}}{dt}
(first derivative of momentum with respect to time)

For example, photons are massless, but they do possesses momentum and can impart force. The momentum of a photon is equal to Planck's constant divided by the photon wave length:

p = \frac{h}{\lambda}

However, air consists of particles that do have mass so the above doesn't really apply in this case. I just wanted to point out that things without mass can have momentum and cause force and pressure.

my understanding is that hot air rises because it is less dense than air that is colder. which is a change in pressure, which is what causes air particles to move. hence wind. so heat causes wind but that doesn't mean wind is heat.
I'm not a meteorologist but that sounds reasonable. Warmer air rises and cooler air moves into take its place.
 
Last edited:
Wind is moving air. And, of course, air has mass. Not only the mass of the atoms of Nitrogen and Oxygen, etc. making up the air but small particles of dirt, insects, etc. all have mass.
 
Wind is the motion of packets of air from a region of high pressure to a region of low pressure, it is the effect, not the cause, of the phenomenon.

<br /> F = ma = \frac{mv^{2}}{2s} = \frac{V\rho v^{2}}{2s} = \frac{As\rho v^{2}}{2s} = \frac{A\rho v^{2}}{2}<br />

A -- cross-sectional area of region in motion
ρ -- mass density of medium
v -- velocity of region

Further derivation yields algorithms for fluid stress (dynamic pressure) and drag, two very useful concepts.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K