mysearch
Gold Member
- 523
- 0
Fair point, but the argument seemingly being put forward in #18 was that “there is no such thing as time, only space”. Therefore, I was only highlighting that removing the concept of time has knock-on effects with respect to current science.The Pauli exclusion principle is only with respect to time, so no, I do not believe it would violate it.
As far as I am aware, the main difference is that Newton saw time as an absolute concept, while Einstein describes time as a relative concept. Therefore, I was just questioning whether the concept of spacetime really affects our separate perception of space and time.I'm not really sure what you mean, but I don't think you can maintain as clear a distinction between them as was previously thought by Newton etc. Clearly one affects the other, but I'd agree they aren't the same.
I agree. However, to many it seems to infer some description of a boundless universe. Therefore, I was just curious to known whether there was any rationale behind this inference or that it was simply pushing the analogy too far.I don't believe the balloon analogy should be taken too far to apply to the shape of the Universe. I think it is only used to explain how Earth is not in the centre despite everything moving away from it.
Unfortunately age isn’t always an indicator of intelligence or wisdom. If it were I would be a lot smarter.But don't ask me, I'm only a 17 year old.
