The fundamental units in Physics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the classification of electric current as a fundamental or derived quantity within the context of physics units and measurements. Participants explore definitions, historical context, and the implications of different unit systems.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether current, defined as a rate of charge flow (I=q/t), should be considered a fundamental quantity since it involves time, a fundamental quantity.
  • Another participant asserts that current is a fundamental quantity, with the ampere as one of the seven SI base units, and provides a historical definition of the ampere.
  • A later reply mentions an upcoming change in the definition of the ampere to be based on the electron charge, suggesting a more "natural" definition.
  • Another participant notes that the practical realization of the ampere is typically done using Ohm's law rather than the historical definition.
  • One participant emphasizes that the distinction between fundamental and derived units is a matter of convention, highlighting that different unit systems may classify these quantities differently.
  • It is mentioned that in SI units, current is fundamental and charge is derived, while in cgs units, both current and charge are considered derived.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the classification of current and charge, with some agreeing on the SI convention while others point out the variability across different unit systems. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these classifications.

Contextual Notes

The conversation reflects the complexity of defining fundamental versus derived quantities, influenced by historical context and the conventions of various unit systems. There are unresolved aspects regarding the practical realization of units and the implications of changing definitions.

Vengo
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I have been in my physics crash course for my entrance exam. I was looking at the chapter "Units and Measurement". I got a doubt in this chapter and I didn't get it cleared by my teacher. So I am posting this in this forum. We have 7 fundamental quantities and other quantities are derived quantities.In those fundamental quantities,We have (CURRENT)and its unit is A. but according to the definition. CURRENT is defined a rate of charge flowing across a cross sectional area of a conductor. and the formula is I=q/t. This looks like a derived quantity because t is a fundamental quantity. It is used in the formula. MY QUESTION IS WHETHER CURRENT IS A FUNDAMENTAL OR DERIVED QUANTITY??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Firstly, you don't need to shout (Capital letters) or bold or italicise your text. We get your question without all that.

Current is a fundamental quantity and ampere is the one the seven SI base units.

To elaborate on your answer, yes current is ##\frac{dq}{dt}## but in SI units current's unit the ampere is defined as

"The ampere is that constant current which, if maintained in two straight parallel conductors of infinite length, of negligible circular cross-section, and placed one metre apart in vacuum, would produce between these conductors a force equal to 2×10−7 Newtons per metre of length"

The fact that ampere is a base unit has to do with historical reasons and the fact that current is easier to measure accurately than charge.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vengo
Thank you for clearing my doubt, Master
 
The definition of the ampere will actually change next year. After 2018 it will be defined via the electron charge which will then be a defined (exact) value giving a more "natural" definition. This also gives a direct connection to the second which is nice.

Note also that the realization of the Ampere described above is never used in practice. In fact, the Ampere is really never really realized directly; it it is always done using Ohm's law using the realizations of the voltage and ohm which we can measure with high precision and accuracy.

Note also that there are some good reasons for why the Ampere (and not the voltage or Ohm) is a base unit; the reasons are nor straightforward but it basically comes down to wanting the SI to be internally self-consistent.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vengo and Mastermind01
Note that the distinction between fundamental units and derived units is purely a matter of convention. The SI convention this year is that current is fundamental and charge is derived. Other systems of units take the opposite approach.

It does not matter what convention you use, only that you use it consistently.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: David Lewis
Thank you f95toli and Dale
But Dale, I cannot get you precisely
 
There are different systems of units: SI units, English units, cgs units, Lorenz Heaviside units, Planck units, etc. Different systems of units will make different choices about which are fundamental and which are derived. For example in SI units current is fundamental and charge is derived, but in cgs units both current and charge are derived
 
OH! thank you, Dale
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
17K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
8K