The GCD forms a subgroup of the integers

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the set {nr + ms | n,m ε Z} forms a subgroup of the integers, focusing on the properties of closure, identity, and inverses within the context of group theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the requirements for closure by expressing the sum of two elements in the set and verifying it can be represented in the form nr + ms. Questions arise regarding the notation and clarity in the proof structure.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the proof, providing feedback on the original poster's approach and clarifying the necessary steps to demonstrate closure and the existence of inverses. There is a constructive exchange of ideas, with some participants confirming the validity of the reasoning presented.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on ensuring that the proof adheres to the definitions and properties of groups, particularly in the context of integers under addition. Some participants note the need for precision in notation and argumentation.

jmjlt88
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
Let r and s be positive integers. Show that {nr + ms | n,m ε Z} is a subgroup of Z

Proof: ---- "SKETCH" -----

Let r , s be positive integers. Consider the set {nr + ms | n,m ε Z}. We wish to show that this set is a subgroup of Z.

Closure

Let a , b ε {nr + ms | n,m ε Z}. Then, a = n1r1 + m1s1 and b = n2r2 + m2s2. Computing a + b (since we are considering Z under additon?), we get

a + b = n1r1 + m1s1 + n2r2 + m2s2.

... All of these elements are integers and our result will again be an integer, and hence a+b will be in our set.

Identity

If we take n,m = 0, we will have 0 ε {nr + ms | n,m ε Z}... Thus, the identity exists.

Inverses
Let a = nr + ms. Take a-1= -nr+-ms since -n,-m ε Z
... Hence, inverses exist our set.

QED


Any huge mistakes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For closure, you need to show a+b is in the set, not that it's an integer. Also, there's only one r and one s, so there's no need for subscripts on them.
 
Vela, so I have to show that a+b can be written as nr + ms for some integers n,m?

The sum a+b = r (n1 + n2) + s (m1+m2)

Then, n1 + n2 and m1+m2 are both integers. Let n1 + n2= n' and m1+m2=m'.

Thus,

a + b = rn' + sm' for n' , m' ε Z and our set is closed.

How this? :) Thanks for your help!
 
Looks good.

All you need to show is closure and that the set contains inverses for its elements to prove it's a subgroup. From those two, it follows that the identity is in the set, and associativity is inherited from the group.

The other approach is to show if a and b are in the set, that a-b is in the set.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K