The ghost rad unit in angular motion

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter stefano77
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of the radian as a unit of measurement in angular motion, particularly in the context of angular frequency and its representation in formulas. Participants explore how radians are treated in calculations and their implications for teaching these concepts without presenting them as dogma.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the radian is dimensionless, similar to ratios of lengths or other dimensionless quantities.
  • Others argue that while radians are used for convenience in showing angles, they do not represent a physical dimension like meters do.
  • A participant raises the question of how to explain the appearance and disappearance of the radian in formulas, particularly in the context of angular frequency.
  • There is a comparison made between radians and degrees, noting that radians can be omitted in certain calculations while degrees cannot.
  • One participant presents an example involving a disc's rotation to illustrate how dimensionless units like rotations can lead to confusion in unit representation.
  • Another participant mentions the potential for confusion between different dimensionless units, such as Hertz and Becquerel, in relation to the radian.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the radian and its role in calculations, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of teaching angular measurements and the implications of treating radians as dimensionless, which may depend on the context of the discussion or the specific application being considered.

stefano77
Messages
20
Reaction score
8
unit of measurement '' rad '' appears and disappears as in calculating angular frequency as square root of k/m in spring-mass model.how can l explain to students?not as a dogma? you can say unit of measuremnt is the inverse of second, but what about the final formula of rad/ s ? rad appears in final result as a ghost
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A radian is the ratio of two lengths, so is dimensionless. Like the ratio of two masses, or the ratio of two velocities.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DeBangis21 and Lnewqban
To put it slightly differently: The unit of rad is equal to 1, dimensionless. Angles are dimensionless and therefore must be measured in dimensionless units. Another unit of angle is the degree, which is ##\pi/180## - still dimensionless.

We write out these units for convenience and for showing that we are dealing with an angle.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: DeBangis21, Gavran and Lnewqban
stefano77 said:
unit of measurement '' rad '' appears and disappears as in calculating angular frequency as square root of k/m in spring-mass model.how can l explain to students?not as a dogma? you can say unit of measuremnt is the inverse of second, but what about the final formula of rad/ s ? rad appears in final result as a ghost
You can omit specifying radians, but you can not omit specifying degrees.

## \sin(2\pi\,rad) ## has the same value as ## \sin(2\pi) ## while ## \sin60\,^\circ ## does not have the same value as ## \sin60 ##

for angular velocity
## 2\pi\,rad/s ## has the same value as ## 2\pi\,1/s ## while ## 60\,^\circ/s ## does not have the same value as ## 60\,1/s ##
 
The radian is a unit, but it's not a dimension. Compare this to something like the meter, which is both a unit and a dimension.

The same issue that arises with the radian also arises with all other dimensionless units. Take for example the revolution. A disc of circumference 2.0 m spins at a rate of 3.0 rotations per second. How fast is a point on its rim moving? You multiply 2.0 m by 3.0 rotations per second and get a result of 6.0 m/s. How did the unit rotation disappear?
 
Mister T said:
A disc of circumference 2.0 m spins at a rate of 3.0 rotations per second.
Confusingly the dimensionless something affects what unit is used for something/second: Hertz vs. Becquerel.
 
Last edited:
A.T. said:
Confusingly the dimensionless something affects what unit is used for something/second: Hertz vs. Becquerel.
I never thought about it before, but perhaps that confusion is another layer that conflates the confusion over the use of the radian.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
903
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
864
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
11K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K