B The ghost rad unit in angular motion

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter stefano77
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of the radian as a unit of measurement in angular motion, emphasizing its dimensionless quality. Radians appear in calculations like angular frequency but can be omitted in expressions without losing meaning, unlike degrees. The radian is compared to other dimensionless units, highlighting how it can "disappear" in calculations, such as when converting rotations to linear speed. The conversation also touches on the confusion between different dimensionless units and their implications in physics. Ultimately, understanding the radian's role is crucial for teaching angular motion concepts effectively.
stefano77
Messages
20
Reaction score
8
unit of measurement '' rad '' appears and disappears as in calculating angular frequency as square root of k/m in spring-mass model.how can l explain to students?not as a dogma? you can say unit of measuremnt is the inverse of second, but what about the final formula of rad/ s ? rad appears in final result as a ghost
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A radian is the ratio of two lengths, so is dimensionless. Like the ratio of two masses, or the ratio of two velocities.
 
  • Like
Likes DeBangis21 and Lnewqban
To put it slightly differently: The unit of rad is equal to 1, dimensionless. Angles are dimensionless and therefore must be measured in dimensionless units. Another unit of angle is the degree, which is ##\pi/180## - still dimensionless.

We write out these units for convenience and for showing that we are dealing with an angle.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes DeBangis21, Gavran and Lnewqban
stefano77 said:
unit of measurement '' rad '' appears and disappears as in calculating angular frequency as square root of k/m in spring-mass model.how can l explain to students?not as a dogma? you can say unit of measuremnt is the inverse of second, but what about the final formula of rad/ s ? rad appears in final result as a ghost
You can omit specifying radians, but you can not omit specifying degrees.

## \sin(2\pi\,rad) ## has the same value as ## \sin(2\pi) ## while ## \sin60\,^\circ ## does not have the same value as ## \sin60 ##

for angular velocity
## 2\pi\,rad/s ## has the same value as ## 2\pi\,1/s ## while ## 60\,^\circ/s ## does not have the same value as ## 60\,1/s ##
 
The radian is a unit, but it's not a dimension. Compare this to something like the meter, which is both a unit and a dimension.

The same issue that arises with the radian also arises with all other dimensionless units. Take for example the revolution. A disc of circumference 2.0 m spins at a rate of 3.0 rotations per second. How fast is a point on its rim moving? You multiply 2.0 m by 3.0 rotations per second and get a result of 6.0 m/s. How did the unit rotation disappear?
 
Mister T said:
A disc of circumference 2.0 m spins at a rate of 3.0 rotations per second.
Confusingly the dimensionless something affects what unit is used for something/second: Hertz vs. Becquerel.
 
Last edited:
A.T. said:
Confusingly the dimensionless something affects what unit is used for something/second: Hertz vs. Becquerel.
I never thought about it before, but perhaps that confusion is another layer that conflates the confusion over the use of the radian.
 
Back
Top