I The Hamiltonian elements in Anderson dimer

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter hokhani
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hamiltonian
hokhani
Messages
561
Reaction score
18
TL;DR Summary
I don't know the occur of - sign in some elements of the Hamiltonian
In a system with two orbitals ##c## and ##d## (each with two spin degrees of freedom), consider the Hamiltonian ##H=V(d^{\dagger}_{\uparrow} c_{\uparrow} + c^{\dagger}_{\uparrow}d_{\uparrow}+d^{\dagger}_{\downarrow} c_{\downarrow} + c^{\dagger}_{\downarrow}d_{\downarrow})##. Also suppose that the many body states are indexed as ##|n_{d_{\uparrow}}, n_{d_{\downarrow}}, n_{c_{\uparrow}} , n_{c_{\downarrow}}\rangle## where ##n## shows the occupation number of each spin-orbital.
As mentioned in the literature, ##\langle1001|H|1100\rangle=V## and ##\langle0110|H|1100\rangle=-V##. However, according to my calculations, ##H|1100\rangle=V(|0110\rangle+|1001\rangle)## which gives ##V## for the two matrix elements ##\langle1001|H|1100\rangle## and ##\langle 0110|H|1100\rangle##. I would like to know where my calculations goes wrong! Any help is appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you provide a citation to an example of the literature you refer to?
 
Haborix said:
Can you provide a citation to an example of the literature you refer to?
Of course. In the following virtual lecture on youtube at the minute 52 (the blue text):

The Hamiltonian is written in the subspace ##Q=2, S_z=0## and I am only interested in the difference between the arrays ##H_{1,3}## and ##H_{2,3}## so I neglected the other terms of the Hamiltonian in my main post.
 
I think you've probably just gotten the order of the basis vectors mixed up. I get ##H|1100\rangle=V(-|0110\rangle+|1001\rangle)+(2\epsilon+U)|1100\rangle##. In the notation of the video I can represent ##|1100\rangle## as $$\begin{pmatrix}0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \\ 0\end{pmatrix}.$$

EDIT: I think I may have misunderstood your question. Are you essentially asking how to get the matrix representation of the Hamiltonian?
 
Last edited:
Haborix said:
I think you've probably just gotten the order of the basis vectors mixed up. I get ##H|1100\rangle=V(-|0110\rangle+|1001\rangle)+(2\epsilon+U)|1100\rangle##. In the notation of the video I can represent ##|1100\rangle## as $$\begin{pmatrix}0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \\ 0\end{pmatrix}.$$

EDIT: I think I may have misunderstood your question. Are you essentially asking how to get the matrix representation of the Hamiltonian?
Thank you so much for your attention. Could you please explain how did you obtain ##c^{\dagger}_{\uparrow} d_{\uparrow} |1100 \rangle =- |0110 \rangle##? In other words, my question is about the appearance of the minus sign.
EDIT: Your answer is quite to the point and I am lookig for the reason for the minus sign.
 
Last edited:
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top