The Hawking radiation and information paradox

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of Hawking radiation and the information paradox related to black holes, exploring the implications of quantum physics on information preservation and the fate of particles that fall into black holes. It includes theoretical considerations and participant interpretations of these phenomena.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that according to quantum physics, information cannot be destroyed, yet the process of Hawking radiation implies that information about particles falling into a black hole is lost when the black hole evaporates.
  • Another participant notes that any particle escaping the event horizon must have positive energy, questioning the analogy used to explain Hawking radiation and its implications for black hole mass.
  • A different participant expresses a belief that information cannot be destroyed, arguing that even if it is lost to us after destruction, it still existed at a prior point in time.
  • One participant references the "black hole wars" and provides a link to a review paper, indicating the ongoing debate surrounding the information loss problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of information in relation to black holes, with no consensus reached on whether information is ultimately preserved or lost. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants raise questions about the mechanics of particle behavior in black holes, such as why only antiparticles fall in and the conditions for annihilation, indicating a need for further clarification on these processes. The discussion also highlights the complexity of the quantum processes involved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying quantum physics, black hole thermodynamics, and the philosophical implications of information theory in the context of black holes.

kdlsw
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Here is my understanding, please correct me if I made any mistake

Quantum physics theory suggests that information (the wave function, state, etc.) cannot be destroyed. All matters fall into a black hole will not be able to escape, which means all information of these particles stay inside the black hole. Virtual particles-antiparticle pairs are created under uncertainty principle, the antiparticle of the pair fall into the black hole while the normal one escapes (Hawking radiation), the antiparticle annihilate with the normal particle inside the black hole, eventually the black hole evaporates, all information inside is gone. It contradicts the quantum physics theory.

I'm not sure if there is any mistake in my understanding.

Here is what I don't understand

1 Why only the antiparticle of the virtual pair falls into the black hole while the normal one escapes?

2 Does the annihilation requires the normal particles somehow "match" the properties of the antiparticle? In another word, the virtual antiparticle can annihilate with any particles in the black hole or only those which have the same properties as the virtual normal particle? (the other particle of the virtual pair)
 
Space news on Phys.org
Any particle [or photon] that escapes the event horizon has positive energy. The popular explanation you noted is merely an analogy to convey the essence of a mathematically complex quantum process, and gives rise to this very natural question. The easy part is it is quite natural to assume any energy that escapes the event horizon must be subtracted from the black hole mass.
 
I might be completely wrong about this but it is my belief that information cannot be destroyed, even in the event of black hole evaporation.

The pure act of information being destroyed is acknowledging that said information existed at a certain point in space-time. Therefore, even if information were to be destroyed at a certain point, it would still be present from the moment it was 'created' up until the last moment before it was destroyed.

Now, unless we are suddenly able to travel through time and access said information, it would indeed be lost to us starting from the moment of its destruction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K