The height s at time t of a silver dollar dropped from the World Trade

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving a function for the instantaneous velocity of a silver dollar dropped from the World Trade Center, emphasizing the principles of motion under uniform acceleration. Participants note that this topic is typically covered in elementary physics textbooks and can be easily researched online. A key point raised is the challenge of using nonmetric units, which requires careful attention in calculations. The conversation highlights the relationship between distance, velocity, acceleration, and time in this context. Understanding these concepts is essential for accurately determining the object's motion.
Yyyanngg
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
New member warned that some effort must accompany homework questions.
Homework Statement
The height s at time t of a silver dollar dropped from the World Trade center is given by
s=−16t2+1350
where s is measured in feet and t is measured in seconds.
a) Find the average velocity on the interval [1, 2].
b) Find the instantaneous velocity when t=1 and t=2.
Relevant Equations
The height s at time t of a silver dollar dropped from the World Trade center is given by
s=−16t2+1350
where s is measured in feet and t is measured in seconds.
I don't have any solution
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you write down a function to give the instantaneous velocity?
 
This is standard stuff found elementary textbooks, or that you can find by googling "Motion under uniform acceleration", that tie together distance travelled, velocity, acceleration and time.

If there is anything special about this, this is the unusual nonmetric units that you will have to be careful about.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K