The Honour System: What Happened & Why?

  • Thread starter Thread starter baywax
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of the honour system, particularly its historical context and perceived decline in modern society. Participants explore various aspects of trust in transactions, comparing past practices with contemporary methods in retail and finance.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the honour system has eroded due to rising corruption or other factors, such as inflation.
  • Others note that newspapers are still sold on an honour basis in certain locations, like airports, suggesting that elements of the honour system persist.
  • A participant shares insights from a study on self-service checkouts, highlighting customer concerns about being falsely accused of theft, which affects their willingness to use such systems.
  • There is a viewpoint that the United States might be a suitable environment for experimenting with honour-based systems due to perceived integrity among its citizens.
  • Some participants express a preference for the honour system over current practices, which involve promises to pay later through credit systems.
  • Concerns are raised about increasing surveillance and security measures in supermarkets, suggesting a decline in trust compared to earlier times.
  • Another participant argues that despite perceptions of declining ethics, there has been a gradual increase in trust necessary for more complex financial transactions.
  • Some contributions reflect on the historical evolution of trust in transactions, from bartering to modern banking, indicating a nuanced view of societal trust dynamics.
  • Participants express skepticism about the existence of a healthy honour system today, citing examples of increased fear and surveillance in various contexts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the state of the honour system, with no clear consensus on whether trust has increased or decreased in society. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these observations on the honour system's health.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about societal trust, the impact of technology on transactions, and differing perspectives on the role of fear in modern commerce. These factors are not fully explored or resolved within the thread.

baywax
Gold Member
Messages
2,175
Reaction score
1
What happened to the honour system? Did it go out with chivalry and/or the Boy Scouts?

The honour system was a system where you actually got your product before you paid for it. Like a news paper box that wasn't locked. You pulled out your paper and then paid the cost of the paper.

Has the system eroded because of rising corruption or for some other reason? Is it because of inflation?

I mean, honour didn't really rely on the level of corruption as far as I can tell. It was in full swing during the 20s when everyone had a machine gun and used it often. So, what brought on the demise of the system?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Newspapers are still sold like that at busy places like airports.
- You do the risk/benefit anaysis on the proportion of papers stolen vs the cost in extra staff to handle the flow of customers.

It's actually becoming more common with self service checkouts in supermarkets.
- interestingly I worked on a study implementing one of these systems, one of the main customer objections was that they would be branded a thief if the system made a mistake and they weren't charged for an item. For a number of customers this was enough of a reason never to use them!
For those customer the risk of being accused of theft was vastly more damaging than the benefit of time saved.
For the supermarket the cost of staffing enough checkouts is so high they were not concerned about theft.
 
mgb_phys said:
Newspapers are still sold like that at busy places like airports.
- You do the risk/benefit anaysis on the proportion of papers stolen vs the cost in extra staff to handle the flow of customers.

It's actually becoming more common with self service checkouts in supermarkets.
- interestingly I worked on a study implementing one of these systems, one of the main customer objections was that they would be branded a thief if the system made a mistake and they weren't charged for an item. For a number of customers this was enough of a reason never to use them!
For those customer the risk of being accused of theft was vastly more damaging than the benefit of time saved.
For the supermarket the cost of staffing enough checkouts is so high they were not concerned about theft.

I think the United States is actually a good place to attempt this sort of experiment. Practically every American I've met appeared to have a large sense of integrity and responsibility...
 
But then again, I've only met one American banker.
 
Eeh?
In old stores, you went up to the shop assistant and asked for what you wanted. Then HE fetched it from the shelf behind him, and handed it over to you as you paid.

Nowadays, in the supermarket, you grab your wares, and if you are honest (or at least not stupid), you dutifully present them to be paid for.
 
I much prefer the Honor System.
 
arildno said:
you dutifully present them to be paid for.
In fact it's worse than that, you offer a promise to pay them later (cheque/credit card) which you can rescind when you get home.

I would say the amount of trust, from ebay to credit cards to posting answers on this forum has actually gone UP in modern society.
 
mgb_phys said:
In fact it's worse than that, you offer a promise to pay them later (cheque/credit card) which you can rescind when you get home.

I would say the amount of trust, from ebay to credit cards to posting answers on this forum has actually gone UP in modern society.

All this is an interesting twist to what I perceived to be a society caught in corrosion of ethics. Maybe its because all the dishonourable acts are reported and the honourable ones not.
 
However... you say the supermarkets are more trusting? The Boarder guards are just waving everyone through with a smile?

I don't know what supermarket you go to but the one's I use are surveyed by semi hidden video cameras and the boarders are getting stricter every month. You also have to pass through a detection device at Wal Mart, and all the rest of the big department stores. I don't think store detectives were introduced until the 50s or 60s. And today they have tasers.

If we looked for remnants of the honour system globally, we would be dismayed. Look at the number of "fail safes" they have in London Eng. A camera on every street corner. And look at the mess "trusting" the average person with a housing loan (and all the fine print) has created.

In many middle eastern countries you'll be dead if you drive over 40km, or if you carry your bread in a canvas bag. Trust is out the window... and its to the advantage of those who have socially engineered the condition of fear.

Please turn these observations into evidence of a healthy honour system..!
 
  • #10
baywax said:
Please turn these observations into evidence of a healthy honour system..!
There is a lot more (artificial) fear!

But in the financial transactions you originally mentioned there has been a gradual increase in trust - there has to be to allow more complex transactions to take place.

It starts with swapping goods, if I give you a sheep in return for a new plow blade there isn't any need for much trust. Then you advance to swapping precious metal coins, then paper money to cheques and credit cards.
Similairly stock markets, insurance,mortgages all rely on a level of trust. Sometimes that fails, but that is taken into account as part of the cost of doing business.
 
  • #11
mgb_phys said:
There is a lot more (artificial) fear!

But in the financial transactions you originally mentioned there has been a gradual increase in trust - there has to be to allow more complex transactions to take place.

It starts with swapping goods, if I give you a sheep in return for a new plow blade there isn't any need for much trust. Then you advance to swapping precious metal coins, then paper money to cheques and credit cards.
Similairly stock markets, insurance,mortgages all rely on a level of trust. Sometimes that fails, but that is taken into account as part of the cost of doing business.

The cost of doing (banking business) is equal to the cost of a good insurance policy... is my guess. Or the profit of selling your bank after getting it/establishing it for next to nothing.

Sometimes I think we didn't win the II WW and that there are forces at work to destabilize what was once a strong and just western alliance. Or are we just doing it to ourselves?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
8K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
12K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
15K
  • · Replies 84 ·
3
Replies
84
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
Replies
31
Views
10K