- #1
Artlav
- 162
- 1
I can't help noticing some inconsistencies in either the accepted large-scale model of the universe or my understanding of it, so any explanations on the points provided are welcome.
Point A:
What are the evidence of the evidence that the universe is expanding?
The red shifts of distant objects seem to indicate that they are moving away, but is this the only explanation?
What i come across are several ways to explain universe's expansion - (a) space expands, matter stays same, (b) space expands, matter expands, (c) space expands, matter sticks together staying same with distances expanding.
What seems inconsistent here:
(a) Dark matter and dark energy. Stuff that is supposed to pull galaxies together, accounting for many supposed mass deficit anomalies, making up 97% of the mass of the universe. A universe made of intangible undetectable something does not sound consistent.
(b) Why the light red shifts then? If it expands too, nothing should change, if it does not, it should blue shift.
(c) Why does all atoms are of the same size then?
(d) Any (d,...,+inf) points i missed?
Are there other explanations for red shifts, and how plausible are they?
(A1) What if the universe is contracting, and the free light does not, producing apparent red shift?
(A2) What if the universe is contracting, and the light stretches on the in-fall on the higher dimension across which it contracts?
(A3) What if the universe is a fixed hypersphere, and the red shift is due to the curvature, like horizon on Earth?
(A4) What if the universe is whatever it is, and the red shift is due to a property of light to red shift due to some kind of "friction" against the "meta medium" of space?
Point B:
The origin.
(B1)Why should there be an origin? (Ok, rhetorical question).
(B2)Why should the start be at the small beginning, why not at a vast beginning? Taking one of the contraction theories from A, the universe can start as an awfully huge cloud of dust, condensing in whatever stuff we see around now, just like the dust after big bang would have condensed. Any objections to that scheme under given assumptions?
(B3)It takes a tiny mass of a big star to make a black hole, and it is assumed that nothing can escape black hole's event horizon, then why big bang matter did? All the matter of the universe concentrated at one point sounds like a huge and hot black hole. What is violated up there?
Point C:
Symmetry.
(C1)What implies that the universe must be symmetric in most if not all terms?
(C2)Why antimatter is supposed to be in symmetric quantities to matter? Can it not be some kind of anomaly, or a different phenomena entirely?
(C3)The T-symmetry violation due to entropy. For all i heared about entropy the main, core part of it is that it is statistical, and like any statistical thing, it is not bound to any laws, only patterns, right? Then why the argument about entropy being increasing/decreasing in time reversal thought experiment is used as evidence?
(C4)Information cannot escape black hole, CPT symmetry violation evidence. I heared, that an event horizon of a black hole extends towards the object about to cross it, is that a real fact/theory prediction/bogosity of the internet? If true, does it mean that information do escape from under event horizon?
To keep this thread sounding sane, i'll cut the list here.
As was said above, explanations are welcome...
Point A:
What are the evidence of the evidence that the universe is expanding?
The red shifts of distant objects seem to indicate that they are moving away, but is this the only explanation?
What i come across are several ways to explain universe's expansion - (a) space expands, matter stays same, (b) space expands, matter expands, (c) space expands, matter sticks together staying same with distances expanding.
What seems inconsistent here:
(a) Dark matter and dark energy. Stuff that is supposed to pull galaxies together, accounting for many supposed mass deficit anomalies, making up 97% of the mass of the universe. A universe made of intangible undetectable something does not sound consistent.
(b) Why the light red shifts then? If it expands too, nothing should change, if it does not, it should blue shift.
(c) Why does all atoms are of the same size then?
(d) Any (d,...,+inf) points i missed?
Are there other explanations for red shifts, and how plausible are they?
(A1) What if the universe is contracting, and the free light does not, producing apparent red shift?
(A2) What if the universe is contracting, and the light stretches on the in-fall on the higher dimension across which it contracts?
(A3) What if the universe is a fixed hypersphere, and the red shift is due to the curvature, like horizon on Earth?
(A4) What if the universe is whatever it is, and the red shift is due to a property of light to red shift due to some kind of "friction" against the "meta medium" of space?
Point B:
The origin.
(B1)Why should there be an origin? (Ok, rhetorical question).
(B2)Why should the start be at the small beginning, why not at a vast beginning? Taking one of the contraction theories from A, the universe can start as an awfully huge cloud of dust, condensing in whatever stuff we see around now, just like the dust after big bang would have condensed. Any objections to that scheme under given assumptions?
(B3)It takes a tiny mass of a big star to make a black hole, and it is assumed that nothing can escape black hole's event horizon, then why big bang matter did? All the matter of the universe concentrated at one point sounds like a huge and hot black hole. What is violated up there?
Point C:
Symmetry.
(C1)What implies that the universe must be symmetric in most if not all terms?
(C2)Why antimatter is supposed to be in symmetric quantities to matter? Can it not be some kind of anomaly, or a different phenomena entirely?
(C3)The T-symmetry violation due to entropy. For all i heared about entropy the main, core part of it is that it is statistical, and like any statistical thing, it is not bound to any laws, only patterns, right? Then why the argument about entropy being increasing/decreasing in time reversal thought experiment is used as evidence?
(C4)Information cannot escape black hole, CPT symmetry violation evidence. I heared, that an event horizon of a black hole extends towards the object about to cross it, is that a real fact/theory prediction/bogosity of the internet? If true, does it mean that information do escape from under event horizon?
To keep this thread sounding sane, i'll cut the list here.
As was said above, explanations are welcome...