The Infinity of the Smallest Particle

  • Thread starter Thread starter AnthonyFB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinity Particle
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of the smallest particle and the implications of cutting it in half infinitely. Participants explore ideas related to dimensionality, decay, and the nature of particles in quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that cutting the smallest particle in half infinitely suggests it will never disappear due to the concept of infinity.
  • Others question the feasibility of cutting something that is dimensionless, raising concerns about the nature of particles.
  • A participant argues that while a particle may decay, it cannot be physically cut in half, suggesting a distinction between cutting and decay.
  • Another participant contends that decay does not imply a simple split, noting that the resulting particles may not retain the same size or characteristics as the original particle.
  • There is a suggestion that particles are dimensionless and that their properties can be divided into the characteristics of resulting particles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the smallest particle, particularly regarding dimensionality and the implications of cutting versus decaying. No consensus is reached on these points.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in understanding the implications of infinity, the definitions of size and dimensionality, and the nature of particle decay versus physical division.

AnthonyFB
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
when the smallest particle is cut in half over and over again infinitely times, it will never disappear... since I used the word infinite, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How do you cut something that has no dimensions?
 
AnthonyFB said:
when the smallest particle is cut in half over and over again infinitely times, it will never disappear... since I used the word infinite, right?

The particle will decay at some randomly determined time. You can't cut it in half.
 
Decay can't necessarily be in the context of "cutting" either, yes it is a split at a vertex but the the two objects combined aren't necessarily the same size as the "un-split" particle because size is irrelevant. Particles have no size they are dimensionless. Quantum characteristics of particles in terms of mass or other quantities can essentially be "split" into the properties of the product particles.
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Infinite range of E-M field vs finite age of particles
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Is infinity the answer of all question that we cannot answer?
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Undergrad Particle Accelerator with the Earth's diameter
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Undergrad Making World's Smallest MEMS Accelerometer
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
High School Dividing by infinity, exactly, finally!
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
7K
Undergrad Formalizing infinity sets
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
433
High School The shell theorem and particles
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Undergrad Particle lifetime (half-life) question
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Graduate If Neutrinos are majorana particles, does this mean lepton number is not conserved?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
High School Rest energies of individual nucleons considered in isolation
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K