The Kirchhoff diffraction formula with small wavelength

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
zhouhao
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The fresnel-kirchhoff diffraction formula could explain diffraction,I think it should also produce the result with relatively small wavelength and large width slit in which case there is no diffraction.
730px-_Kirchhoff_1a.svg.png

Homework Equations


##U(P)=\frac{ia}{2\lambda}\int_S\frac{e^{ik(s+r)}}{sr}[(cos(n,r)-cos(n,s)]dS##

The Attempt at a Solution


when ##\lambda##(wavelength) is very small,the ##U(P)## would very large and seems not equal to ##\frac{ae^ir_{P_0P}}{r_{P_0P}}##
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
One suggestion would be to try it for an observation point that is directly on axis, and use a circular aperture so that the diffraction equations are readily workable. I do expect the diffraction equations for small wavelength and large aperture would give very nearly a shadow when using a single point source on one side of the aperture, but the equations are cumbersome enough, that it might be somewhat difficult to show for the general case.