The Lasting Power of Man-Made Structures

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power Structures
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the longevity of man-made structures, particularly focusing on large-scale constructions and their potential to endure over time. Participants explore various environments, including the moon, space, and Earth, considering factors that contribute to the preservation of these structures.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the definition of "large scale" in the context of man-made structures.
  • Another suggests that building on the moon could lead to structures lasting hundreds of thousands of years, primarily due to the vacuum environment.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the longevity of structures on Earth, arguing that weather and scavengers would likely erase traces of technology within 5 to 10 thousand years.
  • A viewpoint is presented that stone structures, such as Roman ruins, demonstrate significant longevity compared to other materials.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on what constitutes a long-lasting structure and the environments that would best preserve them. There is no consensus on the most effective materials or locations for enduring man-made structures.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of environmental factors, such as weather and potential scavengers, in determining the longevity of structures. There is also a lack of clarity on the specific definitions of "large scale" and "endurance" in this context.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,411
Reaction score
551
What man made structure (large scale) can endure the longest time, i am not thinking pyramid more an/or more oom longer.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Ummm...what? What do you consider "large scale?"
 
FredGarvin said:
Ummm...what? What do you consider "large scale?"

A home, a bridge, a habitable space vehicle.
 
Build something on our moon.
Even a footprint stands a chance of lasting a few hundred thousand years.

Biggest problem would be the stray meteor going splat.
 
NoTime said:
Build something on our moon.
Even a footprint stands a chance of lasting a few hundred thousand years.

Biggest problem would be the stray meteor going splat.

Yes a vacuum is a good preserver, i was thinking of some thing that has to withstand the elements, either on some planet or in space.
 
Space is much the same as the moon if you have a stable orbit.

On a planet with weather and intelligent scavengers I would really tend to doubt that you would find any trace of tech in, say our civilization, after 5 to 10k years.
Perhaps the occasional rock pile and odd bit of ceramic.

In large areas of the world what currently exists isn't tremendously different from what you might have found 3000 years ago.
 
It's pretty apparent from all of the artifacts ever found that stone is the way to go for longevity. Look at all of the Roman ruins that are still around.
 

Similar threads

Why is a Big Back Advantageous for Delivering Mechanical Power?
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
Undergrad Are primordial fluctuations the source of all structure?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
How Do You Calculate the Safe Work Load of a T Beam?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Power Tower in Space: Feasibility & Practicality
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Small-scale hydropower generators installed in irrigation canals
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Using Monopods for city travel utilizing linear induction motors
  • · Replies 95 ·
4
Replies
95
Views
8K
Li-Ion vs LiPo… why not both?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Wood as a carbon neutral biofuel
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
Learning data structures and algorithms in different programming languages
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
3K
Atomic displacements, replacements, and radiation damage of structural materials
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K