The Length of World Line: Prerequisite for Proper Time

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the prerequisites for the statement "the length of world line equals proper time," exploring the conditions under which this relationship holds true. It touches on theoretical aspects of spacetime metrics and the implications of mass and timelike worldlines.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the prerequisite for the length of the world line to equal proper time is that the object must have mass.
  • Others argue that the scaling factor (value of ##c##) is unimportant and merely represents an arbitrary choice of units and sign convention.
  • A participant mentions that the worldline must be timelike everywhere for proper time to be defined, aligning with the earlier comment about mass.
  • It is suggested that the value of ##c## serves as a ratio between units of timelike and spacelike displacements, which is also deemed unimportant.
  • One participant expresses that referring to proper time as the length of a worldline is an imprecise analogy, particularly when communicating with those unfamiliar with Minkowski geometry.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the necessity of mass for the relationship to hold and the timelike nature of the worldline, but there are differing views on the significance of the scaling factor and the precision of terminology used.

Contextual Notes

Some statements reflect a dependence on definitions and may involve unresolved mathematical nuances, particularly regarding the interpretation of metrics and the use of units.

GR191511
Messages
76
Reaction score
6
What is the prerequisite of "the length of world line equals proper time"?C=i?orC=1?If metric is-+++:
##ds^2=-c^2d\tau^2\Rightarrow whenC=i,s=\tau##
If metric is +---:
##ds^2=c^2d\tau^2\Rightarrow whenC=1,s=\tau##
So,which one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The prerequisite is that the object have mass. The scaling factor is unimportant, it is just an arbitrary choice of units and sign convention.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: GR191511, vanhees71 and malawi_glenn
GR191511 said:
What is the prerequisite of "the length of world line equals proper time"?
The worldline must be timelike everywhere, or else proper time is not defined for it (equivalent to Dale's comment about mass).

The value of ##c## is just a choice of ratio between units of timelike and spacelike displacements, so is unimportant. It's similar to putting a meter rule and a yardstick end to end - the total length is the sum of the components' lengths regardless of the units I used to specify them. Experienced people convert units without prompting - inserting ##c## as needed is just a novel example of something you would take in stride in other contexts.

Otherwise, if I were being precise I'd say that ##d\tau=\sqrt{|ds^2|}##. I think that saying that proper time is the length of a worldline is an imprecise analogy. I use it either with people who don't understand Minkowski geometry at all (B-level twin paradox threads) or with people who understand it well enough to know I'm being sloppy and will insert modulus signs as needed. Either way I'd probably scare-quote it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: GR191511, vanhees71 and malawi_glenn
Dale said:
The prerequisite is that the object have mass. The scaling factor is unimportant, it is just an arbitrary choice of units and sign convention.
Thanks
 
Ibix said:
The worldline must be timelike everywhere, or else proper time is not defined for it (equivalent to Dale's comment about mass).

The value of ##c## is just a choice of ratio between units of timelike and spacelike displacements, so is unimportant. It's similar to putting a meter rule and a yardstick end to end - the total length is the sum of the components' lengths regardless of the units I used to specify them. Experienced people convert units without prompting - inserting ##c## as needed is just a novel example of something you would take in stride in other contexts.

Otherwise, if I were being precise I'd say that ##d\tau=\sqrt{|ds^2|}##. I think that saying that proper time is the length of a worldline is an imprecise analogy. I use it either with people who don't understand Minkowski geometry at all (B-level twin paradox threads) or with people who understand it well enough to know I'm being sloppy and will insert modulus signs as needed. Either way I'd probably scare-quote it.
Thank you! I got it
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
835
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K