I The Length of World Line: Prerequisite for Proper Time

Click For Summary
The prerequisite for the length of a world line to equal proper time is that the worldline must be timelike everywhere, which is tied to the object having mass. The choice of scaling factor, whether C=i or C=1, is arbitrary and does not affect the fundamental relationship. The value of c serves merely as a ratio between units of timelike and spacelike displacements, making it relatively unimportant in this context. Proper time can be more accurately described with the equation dτ=√|ds²|, though this analogy can be imprecise. Overall, understanding these concepts requires familiarity with Minkowski geometry and the underlying principles of spacetime.
GR191511
Messages
76
Reaction score
6
What is the prerequisite of "the length of world line equals proper time"?C=i?orC=1?If metric is-+++:
##ds^2=-c^2d\tau^2\Rightarrow whenC=i,s=\tau##
If metric is +---:
##ds^2=c^2d\tau^2\Rightarrow whenC=1,s=\tau##
So,which one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The prerequisite is that the object have mass. The scaling factor is unimportant, it is just an arbitrary choice of units and sign convention.
 
  • Like
Likes GR191511, vanhees71 and malawi_glenn
GR191511 said:
What is the prerequisite of "the length of world line equals proper time"?
The worldline must be timelike everywhere, or else proper time is not defined for it (equivalent to Dale's comment about mass).

The value of ##c## is just a choice of ratio between units of timelike and spacelike displacements, so is unimportant. It's similar to putting a meter rule and a yardstick end to end - the total length is the sum of the components' lengths regardless of the units I used to specify them. Experienced people convert units without prompting - inserting ##c## as needed is just a novel example of something you would take in stride in other contexts.

Otherwise, if I were being precise I'd say that ##d\tau=\sqrt{|ds^2|}##. I think that saying that proper time is the length of a worldline is an imprecise analogy. I use it either with people who don't understand Minkowski geometry at all (B-level twin paradox threads) or with people who understand it well enough to know I'm being sloppy and will insert modulus signs as needed. Either way I'd probably scare-quote it.
 
  • Like
Likes GR191511, vanhees71 and malawi_glenn
Dale said:
The prerequisite is that the object have mass. The scaling factor is unimportant, it is just an arbitrary choice of units and sign convention.
Thanks
 
Ibix said:
The worldline must be timelike everywhere, or else proper time is not defined for it (equivalent to Dale's comment about mass).

The value of ##c## is just a choice of ratio between units of timelike and spacelike displacements, so is unimportant. It's similar to putting a meter rule and a yardstick end to end - the total length is the sum of the components' lengths regardless of the units I used to specify them. Experienced people convert units without prompting - inserting ##c## as needed is just a novel example of something you would take in stride in other contexts.

Otherwise, if I were being precise I'd say that ##d\tau=\sqrt{|ds^2|}##. I think that saying that proper time is the length of a worldline is an imprecise analogy. I use it either with people who don't understand Minkowski geometry at all (B-level twin paradox threads) or with people who understand it well enough to know I'm being sloppy and will insert modulus signs as needed. Either way I'd probably scare-quote it.
Thank you! I got it
 
Moderator's note: Spin-off from another thread due to topic change. In the second link referenced, there is a claim about a physical interpretation of frame field. Consider a family of observers whose worldlines fill a region of spacetime. Each of them carries a clock and a set of mutually orthogonal rulers. Each observer points in the (timelike) direction defined by its worldline's tangent at any given event along it. What about the rulers each of them carries ? My interpretation: each...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
486
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K