The light from Mercury, the Sun's corona and gravity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the confirmation of General Relativity through the observation of light deflection during a solar eclipse, specifically the work of Eddington. It addresses concerns regarding the potential lensing effect of the Sun's corona on the light from Mercury. The discussion concludes that while the corona may have a negligible effect on light deflection, recent measurements using multiple frequency bands have been employed to correct for this. Notably, advancements in radio interferometry and very-long-baseline radio interferometry (VLBI) have provided more definitive measurements of light bending since Eddington's initial observations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity principles
  • Familiarity with solar eclipses and their observational significance
  • Knowledge of light deflection and gravitational lensing
  • Experience with radio interferometry techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of solar corona on light deflection
  • Study the methodologies of very-long-baseline radio interferometry (VLBI)
  • Examine the historical context of Eddington's 1919 eclipse observations
  • Read Clifford M. Will's paper on light bending measurements
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and researchers interested in gravitational lensing, the validation of General Relativity, and advancements in observational techniques in astrophysics.

Wondermine
The question is:
The General Relativity Ideas were confirmed by the position of Mercury by Eddington. How could they be certain that the light deviation was due to gravity rather than the lens effect the Sun's corona may have had?
What process was used,if any,to remove the effect of the corona on the light from Mercury?
The corona is an high energy particle "fog" which would lens light like a crystal. How to remove this in order to be certain gravity bent the light?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're conflating two different tests of General Relativity. What Eddington measured was the deviation of the position of stars due to the deflection of the starlight by the sun's gravity. He measured the positions of these stars during a total solar eclipse and again after the sun had moved away. The precession of the perihelion of Mercury was known since the 1800's to be more than Newton's theory predicted. Eddington was not part of this.

Your question still holds, however. I think the deflection due to the lensing effect of the corona is negligible, but I have no references to back this up. The density of the corona is known, so this deflection could be calculated.
 
This paper by Will reviews the history of measurements of light bending by the Sun:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1409.7812.pdf

He notes on p. 10 that recent measurements have taken readings in multiple frequency bands, to correct for the effects of the Sun's corona (which is expected to deflect radiation of different frequencies by different amounts, whereas the GR effect is the same for all frequencies).
 
Wondermine said:
How could they be certain that the light deviation was due to gravity rather than the lens effect the Sun's corona may have had?

That 1919 eclipse observation is certainly of historical significance. But it may interest you to know that since that time we have observations that are a lot more definitive.
See, for example, this article by Clifford M. Will: http://link.springer.com/article/10.12942/lrr-2014-4#Sec4. Here is a relevant passage:

[...]the development of radio interferometery, and later of very-long-baseline radio interferometry (VLBI), produced greatly improved determinations of the deflection of light.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
1K