- 19,773
- 10,728
Who is excited for this film? I love survival films and his one is hot on my radar!
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3659388/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3659388/
Last edited:
Greg Bernhardt said:Who is excited for this film! I love survival films and it's hot on my radar!
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3659388/
My dilemma as well. We only have a week until the movie is out.OmCheeto said:The problem is, should I read the book first?
4 hours until showtime for me.Greg Bernhardt said:93% on RT! I can't wait to see it next week!
Greg Bernhardt said:I love survival films
OmCheeto said:Ugh! It's in 3D. I hope that technology has improved a bit.
Bring back some popcorn to share !Greg Bernhardt said:Going to see it tonight!
Greg Bernhardt said:Going to see it tonight!
meBigGuy said:No followup? Were you that disappointed?
Borg said:I saw the film a couple of weeks ago and really enjoyed it. As usual there are a few holes in the science from time to time but, otherwise it was really good.
It barely lost 1st place for one week but came right back. It's been #1 for 4 of 5 weeks. The new Bond film Spectre is coming out this week so The Martian will finally be dethroned.OmCheeto said:I heard on the radio yesterday morning that a lot of new movies coming out are not doing too well.
After being out for 5 weeks, "The Martian" is still #1. [ref]
Yay!
Expand, please (preferably w/o spoilers)Bandersnatch said:I finally saw it. It was everything I was hoping it wouldn't be.
Bandersnatch said:So you end up with a film that doesn't have the book's gimmick, character drama, or proper story, and consists of MacGuyver making bombs out of shoelaces, scientists waving their magic computers and spelling the obvious to each other, and pretty visuals peppered with cheap American-centric pathos.
I'm sure. Let's hear it for low standards.Drakkith said:But it does it all so well!
phinds said:Actually, I've got no room to talk. I watch a lot of action movies that are SUCH junk.
Just finished the book. 10 stars out of 10.OmCheeto said:Glad I didn't read the book first.
ps. Just now started reading the book.![]()
OmCheeto said:YES!
The problem is, should I read the book first?
My friend gave me her copy of the book this last Monday.
She'd been meaning to loan it to me for months.![]()
Noisy Rhysling said:So, from a non-sciency guy, was the explosion enough to burn that much O2, and would the O2 before the explosion be enough to Hindenburg the HAB?
Mark said he had created 127 sq. m. of soil, in circular patch.. No other hard numbers. Allow 2 m. for the torus around the soil and 3 m. for overhead?Drakkith said:Not sure. Any idea of the volume of the HAB?
Noisy Rhysling said:I'm utterly sure of my math skills. They have a 100% track record. All failures.
Sounds exactly like my method for cabinetry. Measure twice then screw it up anyway.Noisy Rhysling said:I'm utterly sure of my math skills. They have a 100% track record. All failures.
Jim if you enjoy wood, you should check out my site: http://www.hobbithouseinc.com/personal/woodpics/jim mcnamara said:@phinds I fall flat on my face making backs of chairs. Probably why some those pieces are called splats.
On reading this I was completely flummoxed and could not figure out what you were talking about and then I realized that we have comletely hijacked your recent comments in this thread and started making it a woodworking thread and you are appropriately taking it back to where it is supposed to be. Sorry.Noisy Rhysling said:Question: The Earthbound souls, those poor dears, were aware of Mark being alive after Teddy announced it at that news conference. So, the families were communicating with the Ares, why didn't they mention this to the people they wrote? They'd be aware that the survivors were feeling terrible about having lost him.
Would self-censorship be requested?
Oh, and if you don't want to run out of ketchup, don't use it to make tomato soup.
I always say that as a joke but sadly for me it's not, actually. Every project becomes a challenge in hiding my mistakes.Noisy Rhysling said:Also liked the 'measure twice and screwup anyway' approach.