How Does Corresponding Number Ensure Limit Existence?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wajed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the epsilon-delta definition of limits in calculus, specifically addressing the concept of a "corresponding number" D>0 for every E>0. It establishes that for a limit L to exist, one must be able to find a delta (D) that satisfies the condition |f(x) - L| < E whenever |x - x0| < D. The conversation emphasizes the importance of this correspondence in countering challenges regarding the proximity of f(x) to L, illustrating the relationship between epsilon (E) and delta (D) through practical examples.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of epsilon-delta definitions in calculus
  • Familiarity with limit concepts in mathematical analysis
  • Basic knowledge of functions and their properties
  • Ability to interpret inequalities in mathematical contexts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the formal definition of limits using epsilon-delta arguments
  • Explore examples of epsilon-delta proofs in calculus
  • Learn about continuity and its relationship with limits
  • Investigate advanced topics in real analysis, such as sequences and series
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone seeking a deeper understanding of limit definitions and their applications in mathematical analysis.

wajed
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
If for every number E>0, there exists a corresponding number D>0 such that for all x
|x-x0|<D >> |f(x)-L|<E
Then L is a limit

what is precisely mean of "corresponding number"?
and how can that "correspondance" assure me that the limit exists?

how can a number be corresponding to another number?
I know how can a number be equal/less than/greater than a number, but how can it be corresponding to another number?

I think I understand the definition now, except this "essential?" part
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It just means that if someone tell you E>0, you can tell them D>0 so that the second part is true.
 
Your intention is to foil the following series of arguments by coming up with deltas that work for every scenario:
"You say that f(x) approaches the value L near x=a, but I bet you can't give me an f(x) that is 0.000001 away from L!"
"Of course I can. Just take any x in the interval (a - D, a + D)!"
"Oh okay. but I bet you can't give me an f(x) within 10-10000 of L!"
"No problem. Let x be in the interval (a - D1, a + D1)!"
"Hmm. What about ..."
and so on. The challenges are the epsilons and the responses are the deltas. You can usually formulate an epsilon-delta argument so that the deltas are some function of the epsilon challenges, or argue by inequalities.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K