MHB The Missing Intercept: -1,0 in Parametric Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter soroban
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The parametric equations provided describe a unit circle centered at the origin, resulting in the equation x^2 + y^2 = 1. The y-intercepts are found at (0, 1) and (0, -1) when setting x to zero. The x-intercept is determined to be (-1, 0) when y is set to zero, raising the question of the absence of another x-intercept. The discussion hints at a deeper analytical exploration to understand the missing intercept. This analysis emphasizes the unique nature of the parametric representation and its implications for intercepts.
soroban
Messages
191
Reaction score
0

Consider the parametric equations: \:\begin{Bmatrix}x &=& \dfrac{t^2-1}{t^2+1} \\ y &=& \dfrac{2t}{t^2+1} \end{Bmatrix}

Then: \;x^2 + y^2 \:=\:\left(\frac{t^2-1}{t^2+1}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{2t}{t^2+1}\right)^2 \;=\;\frac{(t^2-1)^2 + (2t)^2}{(t^2+1)^2}

. . . . =\;\frac{t^4-2t^2+1 +4t^2}{(t^2+1)^2} \;=\;\frac{t^4+2t^2+1}{(t^2+1)^2} \;=\;\frac{(t^2+1)^2}{(t^2+1)^2} \;=\;1

We have: \;x^2+y^2\,=\,1, a unit circle centered at the origin.Find the y-intercepts.
Set x=0\!:\;\frac{t^2-1}{t^2+1} \,=\,0 \quad\Rightarrow\quad t\,=\,\pm1
. . Hence: \;y \:=\:\frac{2(\pm1)}{(\pm1)^2+1} \:=\:\pm1

The y-intercepts are: \;(0,1),\;(0,-1)Find the x-intercepts.
Set y = 0\!:\;\frac{2t}{t^2+1}\,=\,0 \quad\Rightarrow\quad t \,=\,0
. . Hence: \;x \:=\:\frac{0^2-1}{0^2+1} \:=\:-1

The x-intercept is: \;(-1,0)What happened to the other x-intercept?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A way of thinking on it.

You are giving to any point of the unit circle the parametrization given by the equation of a line whose gradient is rational and passes through $(1,0)$, and the parameter is when that line intersect the circle at a point diferent from $(1,0)$, then the point $(1,0)$ is going to infinity since it's line is tangent to the circle through $(1,0)$.
 
Another, purely analytic, way of looking at it:
The second "solution" for $y=0$ is $t= \infty$ because
$$\lim_{t \to \infty} \frac{2t}{t^2+1} = 0.$$
So taking the limit as $t \to \infty$ of $x$ gives
$$\lim_{t \to \infty} \frac{t^2-1}{t^2+1} = 1,$$
and $(x,y) = (1,0).$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
10K
Back
Top