The most boring quantum quench (looking for a textbook/paper)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the dynamics of quantum quench, specifically the trivial case where the Hamiltonian changes from ##H_0## to ##H_1 = a H_0##, with ##a > 1##. Participants express skepticism about the significance of this scenario, noting that the eigenstates remain unchanged and only the time evolution is affected by a scaling factor. Despite its perceived simplicity, there is a request for a textbook reference to validate this concept due to ongoing debates among scientists, highlighting the need for clarity in quantum mechanics literature.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, particularly Hamiltonians and eigenstates.
  • Familiarity with quantum quench dynamics and time evolution in quantum systems.
  • Knowledge of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation.
  • Ability to interpret commutators in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Hamiltonian scaling in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the role of commutators in quantum dynamics.
  • Investigate the time-dependent Schrödinger equation and its applications.
  • Review existing literature on quantum quench dynamics for deeper insights.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, researchers in quantum mechanics, and educators seeking to clarify concepts related to Hamiltonian dynamics and quantum quench scenarios.

extranjero
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
Hi,

usually, when we talk about quantum quench dynamics we assume situation when Hamiltonian of a system has a sudden change from ##H_0## to ##H_1##. System was initially in the ground state (or more generally - eigenstate) of ##H_0##. The interesting dynamics appears when the commutator ##[H_0, H_1]\neq 0##. However, due to the some reasons I am looking for a textbook or a paper where non-interesting case ##H_1 = a H_0## is discussed, where ##a## is a number (##a>1## for example). If you know such a book, please, give me a reference.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know if you'll find this specific topic treated in a book, because it appears to be quite trivial, since ##H_1## and ##H_0## differ only by a choice of energy scale. The eigenstates of ##H_0## and ##H_1## are the same, so nothing happens to the state itself, only the time evolution will be affected, and then only by a trivial scaling factor.
 
I know it, but in the anyway, it will be good to find this quite simple thing literally printed in a book (there is an old debate about this problem with my friend and he ask a proof in a book).
 
extranjero said:
I know it, but in the anyway, it will be good to find this quite simple thing literally printed in a book (there is an old debate about this problem with my friend and he ask a proof in a book).
I don't see much interest in this. Would I write a textbook on QM, I don't think this would even make an interesting exercise.

May I ask what the debate is about?
 
I am asking you to include this example into a future book, because some people (not even a student, but scientist who published in PRB) has a big difficulties with this.

You can see the 2 year debates and arguments on this problem here: https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_my_solution_of_time-dependent_Schrodinger_equation_right
 
extranjero said:
I am asking you to include this example into a future book, because some people (not even a student, but scientist who published in PRB) has a big difficulties with this.

You can see the 2 year debates and arguments on this problem here: https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_my_solution_of_time-dependent_Schrodinger_equation_right
I don't think any textbook would help save that debate. One of the "debaters" seems to be stuck on the fact that it is a step function. It is easy to replace with a nicer "turn-on" function that will play essentially the same role.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 376 ·
13
Replies
376
Views
23K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K